- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:01:03 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/markup-spec/#audience > > Thanks. > > With this, I am happy to publish this working draft as a WD. Just so there is no confusion, would it be fair to say that you would have no problem with the chairs interpreting that as supporting a First Public Working Draft, in accordance to the following definition? http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#first-wd > However, I > think it needs the following changes before progressing past WD: > > - How to parse documents that are written using the syntax defined in > that document (needed for tools intended to conform to the > specification, since otherwise there's no way to know what the tools > are supposed to do). > > - The DOM APIs and implementation rules for those APIs, since producers > of documents using the features in this specification need those APIs > to fully use those features. > > - Definition of the event model and task queue model for > implementations, since that will be needed to define the APIs > mentioned. > > - The Window object, browsing contexts, and its related APIs, since that > will be needed to define the APIs mentioned. > > As it stands, the document is not appropriate for its intended audience. Would tracking these as issues suffice? - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 00:01:47 UTC