xml-dist-app@w3.org from January 2002 by date

Friday, 1 February 2002

• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body Mark Baker
• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body Mark Baker
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 31 January 2002

• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Section 5 vs Schema noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: SOAP Encoding - Arrays Simon Fell
• Re: Issue 133: SOAP and The Web Architecture Mark Baker
• RE: SOAP Encoding - Arrays David E. Cleary
• Re: SOAP Encoding - Arrays Simon Fell
• RE: SOAP Encoding - Arrays Don Box
• RE: Section 5 vs Schema Don Box
• RE: Rules for intermediaries handling of PIs, whitespace, etc. Joseph Hui
• Re: Issue 133: SOAP and The Web Architecture Mark Nottingham
• SOAP Encoding - Arrays Simon Fell
• Issue 133: SOAP and The Web Architecture Williams, Stuart
• Rules for intermediaries handling of PIs, whitespace, etc. Don Mullen
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Williams, Stuart
• Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) Williams, Stuart
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) Williams, Stuart
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) Williams, Stuart
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Williams, Stuart
• Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) Jacek Kopecky

Wednesday, 30 January 2002

• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) Williams, Stuart
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) Williams, Stuart
• Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) ) Jacek Kopecky
• Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) ) Williams, Stuart
• RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) Williams, Stuart
• RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) Jacek Kopecky
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) Williams, Stuart
• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body Mark Baker
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body Jacek Kopecky
• Issue 133, and permitting no body Mark Baker
• Re: TBTF: Issue 102: Clarify Rules for Delivering Fault Messages Christopher Ferris
• Re: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Glen Daniels
• Re: TBTF: Issue 102: Clarify Rules for Delivering Fault Messages Marc Hadley
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Williams, Stuart
• RE: TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP Williams, Stuart
• Re: TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP Marc Hadley
• Re: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• [i58] Proposed resolution for issue 58 Glen Daniels

Tuesday, 29 January 2002

• Re: use case : synchronization/Replication across resources Marwan Sabbouh
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) S. Alexander Jacobson
• use case : synchronization/Replication across resources Karandikar, Shailesh
• TBTF: Issue 102: Clarify Rules for Delivering Fault Messages Williams, Stuart
• RE: TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP Williams, Stuart
• TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP Marc Hadley
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Williams, Stuart
• More editorial comments on SOAP Array rewrite integration Jacek Kopecky
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 S. Alexander Jacobson
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Christopher Ferris
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 S. Alexander Jacobson
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Yves Lafon
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Williams, Stuart
• Re: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Doug Davis
• Re: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Christopher Ferris
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Jacek Kopecky
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 28 January 2002

• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Updated proposal for 168: type of referenced data Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Williams, Stuart
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Doug Davis
• minutes of 16 jan 2002 teleconference Yves Lafon

Sunday, 27 January 2002

• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Jacek Kopecky

Saturday, 26 January 2002

• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Martin Gudgin
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Section 5 vs Schema noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Friday, 25 January 2002

• RE: Section 5 vs Schema Don Box
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Don Box
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Don Box
• [i98] Proposed Resolution for Content Based Routing Issue Paul Denning
• RE: Section 5 vs Schema Andrew Layman
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Martin Gudgin
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Marc Hadley
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Martin Gudgin
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Christopher Ferris
• RE: Section 5 vs Schema Williams, Stuart
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Williams, Stuart
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Rich Salz
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Rich Salz
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Marc Hadley
• Re: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Mark Baker
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Williams, Stuart
• Re: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Christopher Ferris
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) Williams, Stuart
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Noah Mendelsohn

Thursday, 24 January 2002

• RE: New Issues Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: New Issues Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? Rich Salz
• RE: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? Jacek Kopecky

Wednesday, 23 January 2002

• RE: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks Mullins, Chalon
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks Eugene Kuznetsov
• RE: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks Clemens Vasters
• RE: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks Mullins, Chalon
• RE: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks David Orchard
• Re: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks John J. Barton
• RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) Williams, Stuart
• RE: Cancellation Paul Cotton
• Re: error handling of dangling references in encoding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Cancellation David Browning
• Cancellation dtrumbo

Tuesday, 22 January 2002

• TBTF decision re. "wire trace" proposal David Fallside
• error handling of dangling references in encoding Christopher Ferris
• Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (fwd) Mark Baker

Monday, 21 January 2002

• Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) Marc Hadley
• Re: New Issues Marc Hadley
• Re: New Issues Mark Baker
• New Issues Marc Hadley
• RE: Proposal for issue 170: referencing missing data Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Proposal for issue 170: referencing missing data Williams, Stuart
• RE: Proposal for issue 170: referencing missing data Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Proposal for issue 170: referencing missing data Williams, Stuart

Saturday, 19 January 2002

• RE: Hierarchical fault codes and RPC Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Proposal for issue 170: referencing missing data Jacek Kopecky

Friday, 18 January 2002

• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? Rich Salz
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks Joshua Allen
• FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks Clemens Vasters
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? Rich Salz
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? Rich Salz
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? Rich Salz
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Martin Gudgin
• Re: XML Schema list simple type Martin Gudgin
• Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Hierarchical fault codes and RPC Williams, Stuart
• Proposal for issue 168: type of referenced data Jacek Kopecky
• Issue 167? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: SOAP Arrays Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Hierarchical fault codes and RPC Jacek Kopecky
• Re: SOAP Arrays Marc Hadley
• Hierarchical fault codes and RPC Marc Hadley
• Re: XML Schema list simple type Jacek Kopecky
• Re: XML Schema list simple type Rich Salz
• Re: XML Schema list simple type Martin Gudgin
• Re: SOAP Arrays Jacek Kopecky
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Williams, Stuart
• XML Schema list simple type Jacek Kopecky
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Jacek Kopecky
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Jacek Kopecky
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Jean-Jacques Moreau

Thursday, 17 January 2002

• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Christopher Ferris
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Media types Mark Baker
• Re: Media types Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Christopher Ferris
• Re: Media types Mark Baker
• Re: Media types Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) Mark Baker
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Williams, Stuart
• RE: Media types Williams, Stuart
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Christopher Ferris
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) Mark Baker
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) Mark Baker
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) Christopher Ferris
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) Jean-Jacques Moreau

Wednesday, 16 January 2002

• Re: Media types Norman Walsh
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Rich Salz
• Re: Question about the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema Bob Cunnings
• Re: Question about the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema Simon Fell
• Re: Question about the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema Martin Gudgin
• minutes of 09/Jan/2002 Yves Lafon
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Christopher Ferris
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Question about the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema Simon Fell
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) Christopher Ferris
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) Mark Baker
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Jacek Kopecky
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Christopher Ferris
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Williams, Stuart
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Williams, Stuart
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Christopher Ferris
• Re: Media types Edwin Ortega
• Re: Media types Edwin Ortega
• Re: Media types Edwin Ortega
• Re: XForms, XML media types, SOAP Edwin Ortega
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Yves Lafon
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Edwin Ortega
• Re: Media types Edwin Ortega
• Re: [TBTF] analysis of open/assigned TBTF issues Edwin Ortega
• Re: Media types Edwin Ortega
• Re: Media types Edwin Ortega
• Re: Media types Edwin Ortega
• Re: Media types Edwin Ortega
• Re: Media types Edwin Ortega
• Re: Media types Edwin Ortega
• Re: Media types Edwin Ortega
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Christopher Ferris
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Jacek Kopecky
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Martin Gudgin
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Christopher Ferris
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Marc Hadley
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Christopher Ferris
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Yves Lafon
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Marc Hadley
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Martin Gudgin
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Martin Gudgin
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Martin Gudgin
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Christopher Ferris
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Jacek Kopecky
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Jacek Kopecky
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Marc Hadley
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Marc Hadley
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 John Ibbotson
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Christopher Ferris
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Martin Gudgin
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Marc Hadley
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Jacek Kopecky
• One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 Marc Hadley

Tuesday, 15 January 2002

• RE: XForms, XML media types, SOAP Micah Dubinko
• Re: Media types Noah Mendelsohn
• [TBTF] analysis of open/assigned TBTF issues Christopher Ferris
• Re: Media types Gavin Thomas Nicol
• RE: Media types Mike Dierken
• RE: Media types David Orchard
• Re: Media types Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: Media types Gavin Thomas Nicol
• RE: Media types Mike Dierken
• Re: Media types Mark Baker
• Re: Media types Mark Baker
• Re: Media types Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: Media types Paul Prescod
• RE: Media types Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Media types Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Media types Mark Baker
• RE: Media types Williams, Stuart
• Re: Media types Christopher Ferris
• Re: Media types Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: Media types Paul Prescod
• Re: Media types Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Media types Paul Prescod
• Re: Media types Mark Nottingham

Monday, 14 January 2002

• Re: Encryption and the processing model Rich Salz
• Re: Media types Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes) Martin Gudgin
• Re: Media types Norman Walsh

Sunday, 13 January 2002

• Re: Encryption and the processing model Mark Baker

Saturday, 12 January 2002

• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Friday, 11 January 2002

• XForms, XML media types, SOAP Mark Nottingham
• TBTF: Transport Binding Feedback list of feedback received. Williams, Stuart
• Re: Encryption and the processing model Rich Salz
• Re: Encryption and the processing model Mark Baker
• RE: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. Williams, Stuart
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: Encryption and the processing model Rich Salz
• RE: Encryption and the processing model David Orchard
• Encryption and the processing model Mark Baker
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services lists
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services lists
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml David Orchard
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Kurt Cagle
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Rich Salz
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Rich Salz

Thursday, 10 January 2002

• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml David Orchard
• Re: XML Protocol comments on Exclusive Canonicalization Joseph Reagle
• Re: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. Christopher Ferris
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Mark Baker
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Paul Duffy
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Champion, Mike
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Frank D. Greco
• Re: Media types Dan Connolly
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services David Orchard
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Francis Norton
• Re: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services John Ibbotson
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Gavin Thomas Nicol
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Frank D. Greco
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. John Ibbotson
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Francis Norton
• Re: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. Marc Hadley
• IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding Marc Hadley
• Re: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Champion, Mike
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Francis Norton
• RE: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. Eamon O'Tuathail
• Re: Request openning of new issue on changes to headers at intermediaries Rich Salz

Wednesday, 9 January 2002

• Re: Media types Mark Baker
• Request openning of new issue on changes to headers at intermediaries noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Media types Tim Bray
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Margaret Green
• Media types Mark Baker
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Mark Nottingham
• Reliablility & HTTP Mark Baker
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Kurt Cagle
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Doug Davis
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Mike Dierken
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Mike Dierken
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services David Orchard
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Champion, Mike
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Ravi Trivedi
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services John Evdemon
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Ravi Trivedi
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Dan Gunter
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Anne Thomas Manes
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Champion, Mike
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Roger L. Costello
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Francis Norton
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Kurt Cagle
• Web Services testing tool Megliola Teodoro (KXT)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Asynch Messaging
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Rich Salz
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Kurt Cagle

Tuesday, 8 January 2002

• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Joshua Allen
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Dan Gunter
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Jeff Bone
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Jeff Bone
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Dave Winer
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Kurt Cagle
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Robert Shmit
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Mike Dierken
• Article: Fat protocols slow Web services Roger L. Costello
• Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. Williams, Stuart
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Williams, Stuart
• RE: SOAP port number Williams, Stuart

Monday, 7 January 2002

• Re: SOAP port number Mark Nottingham
• Re: SOAP port number Mark Baker
• RE: SOAP port number Krishna Sankar
• RE: SOAP port number Eugene Kuznetsov
• Re: SOAP port number Mark Baker
• Re: Other media type related things Mark Nottingham
• Re: SOAP port number Mark Nottingham
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: SOAP port number Krishna Sankar
• RE: SOAP port number Eugene Kuznetsov
• Re: Other media type related things Mark Baker
• Email to TAG re media type questions Mark Baker
• Re: SOAP port number Mark Baker
• Re: Other media type related things Marc Hadley
• RE: SOAP port number Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Other media type related things Mark Baker
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Jacek Kopecky
• Re: SOAP port number Mark Baker
• RE: SOAP port number Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: SOAP port number Mark Baker
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Williams, Stuart

Sunday, 6 January 2002

• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Krishna Sankar

Monday, 7 January 2002

• RE: SOAP port number Krishna Sankar
• SOAP port number Mark Baker

Sunday, 6 January 2002

• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Krishna Sankar
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Krishna Sankar
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Jacek Kopecky

Saturday, 5 January 2002

• Re: Encoding issue: missing elements same as nils? Jacek Kopecky
• Encoding issue: missing elements same as nils? Jacek Kopecky
• Proposal for issue #129: lacking examples in part 2, sec. 4.1 Jacek Kopecky
• SOAP encodingStyle Attribute Bob Cunnings
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Mark Baker
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Krishna Sankar
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Rich Salz
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Pae Choi

Friday, 4 January 2002

• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Mark Nottingham
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Mark Baker
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Rich Salz
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Mark Baker
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Rich Salz
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Mark Baker
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Mark Baker
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Rich Salz
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Williams, Stuart
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Williams, Stuart
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Mark Baker
• RE: Media type encoding parameter? Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Media type encoding parameter? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Media type encoding parameter? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Christopher Ferris
• Re: Multicast MEP and multiple body actors Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Jacek Kopecky
• Draft registration of application/soap+xml Mark Baker
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 3 January 2002

• Encoding namespace convention Mark Baker
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Christopher Ferris
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Christopher Ferris
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Christopher Ferris
• Re: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Marc Hadley
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding Noah Mendelsohn
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Christopher Ferris
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd) Noah Mendelsohn
• Schema for the proposed (accepted?) faultcode structure Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Mark Baker
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Mark Baker
• RE: Media type encoding parameter? Williams, Stuart
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Williams, Stuart
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Mark Baker
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd) Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Wednesday, 2 January 2002

• Re: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization Rich Salz

Friday, 21 December 2001

• Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" Williams, Stuart

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2002 23:48:52 UTC