- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:47:23 +0100 (CET)
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- cc: XML Protocol Discussion <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Rich, I understand that it is valid as long as the types "match"
the schema. 8-)
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
http://www.systinet.com/
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Rich Salz wrote:
> > The ETF discussed this issue in a recent telcon and would like to
> > propose a change to section 3.4 of the current editors draft[1] to
> > lessen the schema bias in the examples by showing the mapping from
> > programming language compound types to SOAP encoding.
>
>
> great.
>
> > or as follows if a schema is available
> >
> > <e:Book xmlns:e="http://example.org/2001/12/books">
> > <e:author>Henry Ford</e:author>
> > <e:preface>Preface text</e:preface>
> > <e:intro>Henry Ford</e:intro>
> > </e:Book>
>
>
> If a schema is available is the following also (still) valid?
> <e:Book xmlns:e="http://example.org/2001/12/books"
> xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding">
> <enc:string>Henry Ford</enc:string>
> <enc:string>Preface text</enc:string>
> <enc:string>Henry Ford</enc:string>
> </e:Book>
>
> And various mix-and-match combinations of the two?
> /r$
>
>
Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 10:47:30 UTC