- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:25:03 -0800
- To: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Cc: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 12:50:18PM -0500, Christopher Ferris wrote: > I much prefer Henrik's suggested addition of an > action parameter in the mime header over the SOAPAction > HTTP header. So you're OK with action being present on an HTTP response, or an SMTP message? Hmm... actually, giving (SOAP)action a wider scope in this manner might reinforce that it's only a hint, rather than limiting it to use in HTTP requests, where it looks like it does something more. > I also think that charset is appropriate, but that's about all. Agreed. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 20:25:04 UTC