Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Ferris" <chris.ferris@sun.com>
To: "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2


>
>
> Yves Lafon wrote:
>
> <snip/>
> >>NB, separate issue for editors: there seems to be an error here
> >>and elsewhere in the part2 spec, the single-request-response
> >>tmep URI shouldn't belong to the domain www.example.com, but rather
> >>to the w3c.org domain, no? Isn't the HTTP binding intended to be
> >>normative?
> >>
> >
> > The fact that a URI of an example is in the example.com domain or
w3c.org
> > domain don't change the normative/non-normative of the section, the
> > constraint being that all URI in w3.org should be deferencable.
>
>
> I don't think that we can define normative URIs belonging
> to the www.example.com domain as that domain is reserved
> for use in specifications and as such is unmanaged. If we're
> describing a normative HTTP binding, that defines URIs that
> are to be used to identify a resource such as a definition
> for a MEP, then the domain of that URI needs to be one that
> the W3C manages.
>
> I don't think that the URIs we're defining for the definition
> of the single-request-response MEP is meant as an example,
> I believe that it is meant as a normative definition that can
> be referenced by other/future binding specifications.
>
>
> >
> >
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 12:30:56 UTC