- From: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:37:58 -0500
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
This message responds to an action item from the Nov 2001 face to face meeting to track down the story on issue 98 [1]. The issue description states "Content based routing of unormalized payloads. For example, if it is needed to specify that any payload that includes the term FOO-BAR be sent to a particular location, and if the payloads can contain unnormalized variations of FOO-BAR, then some of the payloads may not be routed to the right places. (At least by some definitions." Proposed Resolution: Routing is not within the scope of SOAP 1.2, but can specified using the extension mechanisms provided by SOAP 1.2. If normalization is required for content-based routing extensions to work properly, then the specifications for content-based routing extensions must ensure normalization. This appears to be feasible by defining a SOAP header block (with mustUnderstand="true") whose semantics would imply that the SOAP envelope (and its descendants) be normalized before applying a content-based routing function. In addition, a related extension feature could use a SOAP header block to indicate explicitly that a SOAP envelope has not yet been normalized; such a header block can be removed after the envelope has been normalized. To reiterate, extensions for routing and normalization are not within the scope of the SOAP 1.2 specifications. [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x98 Paul
Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 16:38:24 UTC