RE: SOAP port number

Hi,

 |
 | So, can we agree to *not* defining a standard port, but instead document
 | that a non-default port should be used when SOAP is used to tunnel
 | (which is a refinement on the agreement at the SJ F2F)?  We'd have to
 | define tunnel well - I think my response to Rich[1] could be used as a
 | basis for that text, in part.
 |
<KS>
 Not yet.

 Looks like an anemic response to me. If we encourage a non-default port,
why not suggest one as well. That will only help the adoption of our
recommendation. I would like to understand why RECOMMENDING a port is a bad
thing.
<KS>

cheers