- From: Edwin Ortega <ortegae@wns.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:04:26 -0800
- To: "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org> To: "Edwin Ortega" <ortegae@wns.net> Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:34 AM Subject: Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 > On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Edwin Ortega wrote: > > > > I don't think that the URIs we're defining for the definition > > > of the single-request-response MEP is meant as an example, > > > I believe that it is meant as a normative definition that can > > > be referenced by other/future binding specifications. > > As I said it is for example, to have a real MEP definition that use URI in > W3C workspace, URI will exist and be deferencable (like namespaces for > instance). > > -- > Yves Lafon - W3C > "Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras." > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 14:07:07 UTC