- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 10:02:29 -0500 (EST)
- To: henrikn@microsoft.com (Henrik Frystyk Nielsen)
- Cc: jacek@systinet.com (Jacek Kopecky), chris.ferris@sun.com (Christopher Ferris), xml-dist-app@w3.org
> I think there is a close relationship between the intent of a message > and the type (at least as described by the SOAPAction header field). By > connecting the two, the relationship would be made explicit. Henrik, am I correct in assuming that the reason this isn't already part of SOAP 1.1, is because of the SOAPMethodName RPC legacy? i.e. "type" or "namespace" doesn't accurately reflect the meaning of an RPC method? MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 10:02:04 UTC