- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:50:58 -0500 (EST)
- To: marc.hadley@sun.com (Marc Hadley)
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Mark Baker wrote: > > > > > 2. Differing envelope namespace & "envelope" parameter > > > > (assuming we keep it) > > > > A recipient of such a SOAP message MUST send a VersionMismatch > > fault. > > > > That would mean a change to the meaning of the VersionMismatch fault. > Not necessarily a bad thing, but worth noting. Perhaps a different error > might be appropriate ? Yah, the more I think about it, the more I'm thinking that - in the face of no concrete use case for its existence - we should scrap envelope. It can be added later if needed. MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Monday, 7 January 2002 12:50:17 UTC