Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services from Dan Gunter on 2002-01-08 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from January 2002)

From: Dan Gunter <dkgunter@lbl.gov>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 14:34:49 -0800
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <3C3B7409.6020901@lbl.gov>

seems mostly wrong to me. Message size?!? a 34-byte binary message and a 
900-byte SOAP message both fit equally well into a 1500-byte MTU.

what _would_ be useful is some real performance results ; anybody know 
of any?

Dan

Roger L. Costello wrote:

>Any comment on this article?
>
>http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2836041,00.html
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2002 17:34:50 UTC