Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? from Jacek Kopecky on 2002-01-18 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from January 2002)

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:25:48 +0100 (CET)
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201181722470.32025-100000@mail.idoox.com>

 Hi, just after the break I sent in a new issue (now number 177 
[1]) about the difference in missing accessors in structs and 
accessors with xsi:nil="true" on them.
 The email [2] contains a proposed split into two options.
 I understand that the message might have gotten lost in the 
post-break email heaps so please read it now if you are 
concerned.
 Best regards,

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x177
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jan/0057.html

Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 11:25:50 UTC