Re: New Issues

Mark Baker wrote:

> Hi Marc,
> 
> 
>>(ii) Non-opaque URI for encodingStyle value
>>
>>4.1.1 SOAP encodingStyle Attribute
>>"In addition, all URIs syntactically beginning with 
>>'http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding' indicate conformance with the 
>>SOAP encoding rules defined in [1](SOAP Encoding), though with 
>>potentially tighter rules added."
>>
>>I recall seeing this raised previously on the list but couldn't find the 
>>post in the archives.
>>
> 
> That was presumably my post;
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jan/0027.html
> 

That was the one, thanks.


> 
>>I believe that the above use of a URI is unusual, 
>>   are the semantics described above desirable ?
>>
> 
> I think the question is, are the semantics (being able to indicate
> conformance to the default encoding) required?  If so, then the
> mechanism for communicating those semantics should change, perhaps to
> that suggested in my referenced email (assuming rdfs:subClassOf is
> the desired relationship).
> 

+1


Marc.

-- 
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.

Received on Monday, 21 January 2002 12:16:18 UTC