- From: Edwin Ortega <ortegae@wns.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:24:20 -0800
- To: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@rbii.com>, "David Orchard" <david.orchard@bea.com>, "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>, "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@prescod.net>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@rbii.com> To: "David Orchard" <david.orchard@bea.com>; "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>; "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@prescod.net> Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:10 AM Subject: Re: Media types > On Tuesday 15 January 2002 01:23 pm, David Orchard wrote: > > I tend to agree with TimBL because the first child is the first > > thing a piece of software has to understand, therefore it is most > > useful to be able to route to the right piece of software. Although > > this point tends to be somewhat moot because a lot of software will > > do the right thing with the document even if the content-type was > > wrong because the URL is the main routing component, not the > > content-type. > > I think you have to ask "what is the software, and how did it get the > document in the first place?" > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 12:27:38 UTC