- From: Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:20:54 -0500
- To: "Jacek Kopecky <jacek" <jacek@systinet.com>
- Cc: "xml-dist-app" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Jacek Kopecky writes: >> IMO this shows that in SOAP Encoding we don't >> really want either >> 1) the strong requirement that every value >> is XSD typed, or >> 2) to use XSD simple types, or >> 3) to allow external references. >> Pick one. I favor 3 over 1 over 2. 8-) The wording of 1 is potentially ambiguous. It might be taken to mean that we want a design where: 1a) It's OK to have values that are untyped - or - 1B) All values must be typed, but some of those types need not be XSD types (e.g. some might be MIME types or some such) My own leanings would be either toward 1a (base typing on XSD, but allow untyped nodes), with a second choice of 3 (external hrefs are not considered part of the encoded graph at all.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 12:22:18 UTC