- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:33:38 -0500 (EST)
- To: jacek@systinet.com (Jacek Kopecky)
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Mark, > I'm not sure the wording "envelope URI" is clear. > Do you mean the access URI or the root element namespace URI? I don't know what you mean by "access URI". I mean the latter. I'll fix, thanks. > Even though I don't object to the envelope parameter, I still > think action is inappropriate for "intenet" and "type" are two > different orthogonal things and should be kept as such. Envelope > version is part of the type but intent may vary for one message > on different servers. I'll be happy to use whatever the WG decides. MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 12:33:08 UTC