- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 06:40:19 -0800
- To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>, "Christopher Ferris" <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I think there is a close relationship between the intent of a message and the type (at least as described by the SOAPAction header field). By connecting the two, the relationship would be made explicit. Henrik > I don't think that this is enough of a reason for overloading >the type. And anyway, any MIME-based protocol can add a >SOAPAction MIME header so it _can_ translate across different >protocols. I doubt non-MIME-based protocols would use MIME type >in its full form, i.e. possibly with parameters. Is there such a >protocol?
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 09:40:51 UTC