- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:00:43 +0100 (CET)
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Mark,
> > To summarize, I don't think anybody has presented rationale for
> > any parameter to the SOAP MIME type except for "it might be
> > useful" which I find too weak for the addition.
>
> Including "action"? I thought Henrik described its value well. I had
> suggested the same thing a few months earlier too.
Excluding "action". This parameter (if it's what is represented
by the SOAPAction header now), IMO, does not belong to the MIME
_type_ of the message. But in any case the reasons for SOAPAction
have been considered good enough by the WG and I don't want to
object to this resolution now.
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
http://www.systinet.com/
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 11:00:46 UTC