- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 09:59:13 -0500
- To: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
- CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
To recap. I looked at sec5.1, definition #5 and said that since the spec defines a SOAP "array" where only the position distinguishes among values, the names are not significant and a conforming implementation could "lose" the name information. [1] Andrew quotes 5.1 rule2C and said that the name could be important, and that it is not legit for the SOAP layer to toss it. [2] The message that started the thread is [3]. I believe that 5.1def5 is defining a "SOAP 'array'", and not a general-purpose array, and that if the names are important, then you cannot use a SOAP "array" to encode your otherwise-array-like data. Can we have a ruling from the floor? And appropriate clarification language in 1.2? Happy new year. /r$ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Dec/0287.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Dec/0288.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Dec/0248.html -- Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption http://www.zolera.com
Received on Wednesday, 2 January 2002 09:56:48 UTC