- From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 07:26:49 -0500
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Mark Nottingham wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 12:50:18PM -0500, Christopher Ferris wrote: > >>I much prefer Henrik's suggested addition of an >>action parameter in the mime header over the SOAPAction >>HTTP header. >> > > So you're OK with action being present on an HTTP response, or an > SMTP message? Yes > > Hmm... actually, giving (SOAP)action a wider scope in this manner > might reinforce that it's only a hint, rather than limiting it to use > in HTTP requests, where it looks like it does something more. precisely > > > >>I also think that charset is appropriate, but that's about all. >> > > Agreed. > > >
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 07:27:46 UTC