- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:44:25 -0000
- To: "Hugo Haas (E-mail)" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Hugo, Issue 133 [1] came up for discussion on the TBTF today, in particular the concern over SOAP's use of HTTP POST in a manner that may not be compliant with Web Architecture [2]. The TBTF are currently proposing that we recognise in the spec. that the HTTP binding in Part 2 Adjuncts is 'an' HTTP binding rather than 'the' HTTP binding. The HTTP binding we intend to offer will follow the pattern of using the HTTP POST method established in SOAP 1.1 [3]. The topic of Web Architecture is the subject of continuing debate, including and referenced from the thread that originated this issue[4]. The TBTF do not find themselves able to resolve the philosophical issues enclosed there-in, but believe that the SOAP protocol binding framework is flexible enough to allow the creation of different bindings to HTTP as and when these issues are resolved. So, at this time the proposal from the TBTF to close Issue 133 is that the binding we offer in SOAP 1.2 continue to use the HTTP POST method in the manner established in SOAP 1.1 and to note that our binding framework makes it is possible to define additional HTTP bindings. I anticipate this topic being on the agenda for the next WG telcon. Best regards Stuart Williams (for the TBTF) [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x133 [2] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#state [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/ [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Aug/0202.html
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2002 12:44:32 UTC