xml-dist-app@w3.org from January 2002 by author

Andrew Layman

• RE: Section 5 vs Schema (Friday, 25 January)

Anne Thomas Manes

• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)

Asynch Messaging

• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)

Bob Cunnings

• Re: Question about the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema (Wednesday, 16 January)
• SOAP encodingStyle Attribute (Saturday, 5 January)

Champion, Mike

• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)

Christopher Ferris

• Re: TBTF: Issue 102: Clarify Rules for Delivering Fault Messages (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Friday, 25 January)
• error handling of dangling references in encoding (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [TBTF] analysis of open/assigned TBTF issues (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Thursday, 3 January)

Clemens Vasters

• RE: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks (Wednesday, 23 January)
• FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks (Friday, 18 January)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Media types (Thursday, 10 January)

Dan Gunter

• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Tuesday, 8 January)

Dave Winer

• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Tuesday, 8 January)

David Browning

• Cancellation (Wednesday, 23 January)

David E. Cleary

• RE: SOAP Encoding - Arrays (Thursday, 31 January)

David Fallside

• TBTF decision re. "wire trace" proposal (Tuesday, 22 January)

David Orchard

• RE: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: Encryption and the processing model (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)

Don Box

• RE: SOAP Encoding - Arrays (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Section 5 vs Schema (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Section 5 vs Schema (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Friday, 25 January)

Don Mullen

• Rules for intermediaries handling of PIs, whitespace, etc. (Thursday, 31 January)

Doug Davis

• Re: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)

dtrumbo

• Cancellation (Wednesday, 23 January)

Eamon O'Tuathail

• RE: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. (Thursday, 10 January)

Edwin Ortega

• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: XForms, XML media types, SOAP (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: [TBTF] analysis of open/assigned TBTF issues (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)

Eugene Kuznetsov

• RE: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)

Francis Norton

• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)

Frank D. Greco

• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Thursday, 10 January)

Gavin Thomas Nicol

• Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Thursday, 10 January)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [i58] Proposed resolution for issue 58 (Wednesday, 30 January)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: New Issues (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: Hierarchical fault codes and RPC (Saturday, 19 January)
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: Media type encoding parameter? (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: Media type encoding parameter? (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Thursday, 3 January)

Jacek Kopecky

• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) ) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• More editorial comments on SOAP Array rewrite integration (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Updated proposal for 168: type of referenced data (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: Proposal for issue 170: referencing missing data (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: Proposal for issue 170: referencing missing data (Monday, 21 January)
• Proposal for issue 170: referencing missing data (Saturday, 19 January)
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? (Friday, 18 January)
• Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? (Friday, 18 January)
• Proposal for issue 168: type of referenced data (Friday, 18 January)
• Issue 167? (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: SOAP Arrays (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Hierarchical fault codes and RPC (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: XML Schema list simple type (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: SOAP Arrays (Friday, 18 January)
• XML Schema list simple type (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Media types (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (Tuesday, 8 January)
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Sunday, 6 January)
• Re: Encoding issue: missing elements same as nils? (Saturday, 5 January)
• Encoding issue: missing elements same as nils? (Saturday, 5 January)
• Proposal for issue #129: lacking examples in part 2, sec. 4.1 (Saturday, 5 January)
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: Media type encoding parameter? (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Multicast MEP and multiple body actors (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (Thursday, 3 January)
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Thursday, 3 January)
• Schema for the proposed (accepted?) faultcode structure (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd) (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: NameValue and NameValueList data types (Wednesday, 2 January)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: error handling of dangling references in encoding (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. (Thursday, 10 January)

Jeff Bone

• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Tuesday, 8 January)

John Evdemon

• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)

John Ibbotson

• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. (Thursday, 10 January)

John J. Barton

• Re: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks (Wednesday, 23 January)

Joseph Hui

• RE: Rules for intermediaries handling of PIs, whitespace, etc. (Thursday, 31 January)

Joseph Reagle

• Re: XML Protocol comments on Exclusive Canonicalization (Thursday, 10 January)

Joshua Allen

• RE: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Tuesday, 8 January)

Karandikar, Shailesh

• use case : synchronization/Replication across resources (Tuesday, 29 January)

Krishna Sankar

• RE: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Sunday, 6 January)
• RE: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Sunday, 6 January)
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Sunday, 6 January)
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Saturday, 5 January)

Kurt Cagle

• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Tuesday, 8 January)

lists

• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Friday, 11 January)

Marc Hadley

• Re: TBTF: Issue 102: Clarify Rules for Delivering Fault Messages (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP (Wednesday, 30 January)
• TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Friday, 25 January)
• Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: New Issues (Monday, 21 January)
• New Issues (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: SOAP Arrays (Friday, 18 January)
• Hierarchical fault codes and RPC (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. (Thursday, 10 January)
• IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Other media type related things (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Thursday, 3 January)

Margaret Green

• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)

Mark Baker

• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Issue 133: SOAP and The Web Architecture (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Issue 133, and permitting no body (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (fwd) (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: New Issues (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) (Thursday, 17 January)
• I-D ACTION:draft-baker-soap-media-reg-00.txt (fwd) (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Encryption and the processing model (Sunday, 13 January)
• Re: Encryption and the processing model (Friday, 11 January)
• Encryption and the processing model (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Media types (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Reliablility & HTTP (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Other media type related things (Monday, 7 January)
• Email to TAG re media type questions (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• Other media type related things (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Saturday, 5 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Friday, 4 January)
• Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 4 January)
• Encoding namespace convention (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Thursday, 3 January)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Issue 133: SOAP and The Web Architecture (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• XForms, XML media types, SOAP (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Other media type related things (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: SOAP port number (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Media type encoding parameter? (Friday, 4 January)

Martin Gudgin

• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Saturday, 26 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: XML Schema list simple type (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: XML Schema list simple type (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Question about the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes) (Monday, 14 January)

Marwan Sabbouh

• Re: use case : synchronization/Replication across resources (Tuesday, 29 January)

Megliola Teodoro (KXT)

• Web Services testing tool (Wednesday, 9 January)

Micah Dubinko

• RE: XForms, XML media types, SOAP (Tuesday, 15 January)

Mike Dierken

• RE: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Tuesday, 8 January)

Mullins, Chalon

• RE: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: FW: Why web-style session state management doesn't work for web services, methinks (Wednesday, 23 January)

Noah Mendelsohn

• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: New Issues (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encodi ng (fwd) (Thursday, 3 January)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Friday, 1 February)
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
• RE: Section 5 vs Schema (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Saturday, 26 January)
• RE: Section 5 vs Schema (Saturday, 26 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Saturday, 12 January)
• Request openning of new issue on changes to headers at intermediaries (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: issue 168 proposal: xsi:type of external references in Encoding (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Wednesday, 2 January)
• RE: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization (Wednesday, 2 January)

Norman Walsh

• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Media types (Monday, 14 January)

Pae Choi

• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Saturday, 5 January)

Paul Cotton

• RE: Cancellation (Wednesday, 23 January)

Paul Denning

• [i98] Proposed Resolution for Content Based Routing Issue (Friday, 25 January)

Paul Duffy

• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Thursday, 10 January)

Paul Prescod

• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)

Ravi Trivedi

• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)

Rich Salz

• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Section 5 vs Schema (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Repost issue: missing accessors same as NILs? (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: XML Schema list simple type (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Encryption and the processing model (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: Encryption and the processing model (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Encryption and the processing model (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Request openning of new issue on changes to headers at intermediaries (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Saturday, 5 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization (Wednesday, 2 January)

Robert Shmit

• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Tuesday, 8 January)

Roger L. Costello

• Re: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Article: Fat protocols slow Web services (Tuesday, 8 January)

S. Alexander Jacobson

• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Tuesday, 29 January)

Sean B. Palmer

• Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)

Simon Fell

• Re: SOAP Encoding - Arrays (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: SOAP Encoding - Arrays (Thursday, 31 January)
• SOAP Encoding - Arrays (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Question about the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Question about the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema (Wednesday, 16 January)

Tim Bray

• Re: Media types (Wednesday, 9 January)

Williams, Stuart

• Issue 133: SOAP and The Web Architecture (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) ) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP (Wednesday, 30 January)
• TBTF: Issue 102: Clarify Rules for Delivering Fault Messages (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: Section 5 vs Schema (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Resolving the Ed Note in Part 1 section 5.1 (was New Issues) (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: Proposal for issue 170: referencing missing data (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: Proposal for issue 170: referencing missing data (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: Hierarchical fault codes and RPC (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Thursday, 17 January)
• RE: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
• RE: IDREF vs HREF for graph edges in SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
• TBTF: Transport Binding Feedback list of feedback received. (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. (Friday, 11 January)
• Wire Trace approach to MEP/Binding descriptions. (Tuesday, 8 January)
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Tuesday, 8 January)
• RE: SOAP port number (Tuesday, 8 January)
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: Media type encoding parameter? (Thursday, 3 January)
• RE: Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Thursday, 3 January)
• Issue #170: "Referencing Data missing from the message" (Friday, 21 December)

Yves Lafon

• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• minutes of 16 jan 2002 teleconference (Monday, 28 January)
• minutes of 09/Jan/2002 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 16 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2002 23:48:52 UTC