Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes) from Martin Gudgin on 2002-01-14 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from January 2002)

From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:38:57 -0000
To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00aa01c19d09$34a79930$977ba8c0@greyarea>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:56 AM
Subject: Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)


> > FWIW, SOAP fault codes currently uses qnames as values, see also [1].
>
> Oops, of course.  Any other precedent?  No API that I'm familiar with
> (SAX, DOM, JDOM) supports it explicitly

( One of ) the reason(s) begin/endPrefixMapping exist in SAX2 is to deal
with the issue of QNames in attribute and element content.

Gudge

Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 09:39:59 UTC