Thursday, 30 September 2010
- [Bug 10357] [IndexedDB] Remove the SNAPSHOT_READ transaction mode
- Re: ACTION-587: P&C spec: license element doesn't define its Expected Children (Web Applications Working Group)
- Re: Comment on Widget Interface...
- RE: Comment on Widget Interface...
- Re: Comment on Widget Interface...
- RE: [IndexedDB] READ_ONLY vs SNAPSHOT_READ transactions
- [Bug 10798] Find a new home for Selection
- Re: [IndexedDB] Calling setVersion while already in a setVersion transaction
- RE: Comment on Widget Interface...
- Re: Comment on Widget Interface...
- Re: [IndexedDB] Calling setVersion while already in a setVersion transaction
- [Bug 9989] Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.
- Proposal: Adding MemoryInfo to WebTiming
- ISSUE-134 (optional useCapture): Consider making useCapture parameter of add/removeEventListener optional [DOM3 Events]
Wednesday, 29 September 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Calling setVersion while already in a setVersion transaction
- Re: CfC: First Public Working Draft of Web DOM Core; deadline October 2
- Re: [CORS] Suggested HTTP error codes on forbidden origin, unsupported method, etc.?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Calling setVersion while already in a setVersion transaction
- [IndexedDB] Calling setVersion while already in a setVersion transaction
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: [CORS] Suggested HTTP error codes on forbidden origin, unsupported method, etc.?
- RE: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- RE: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- RE: [IndexedDB] setVersion with multiple IDBDatabase objects
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
Tuesday, 28 September 2010
- Re: FileSystem API - overwrite flag for copy/move?
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: Small tweak to FileWriter's event sequences
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- RE: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- [Bug 10794] New: [IndexedDB] Clarify createObjectStore/removeObjectStore's tie to the database setVersion was called on
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion with multiple IDBDatabase objects
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion with multiple IDBDatabase objects
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion with multiple IDBDatabase objects
- [IndexedDB] setVersion with multiple IDBDatabase objects
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [CORS] Multiple origin values?
- [widgets] Best practice / recommendation for widget id scheme?
- Re: [CORS] Multiple origin values?
- [Bug 9989] Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.
- [Bug 10546] It looks like at least some browsers restrict legend display values to "block"
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
Monday, 27 September 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] A "versionchangeblocked" event
- Re: [XHR2] Comments on the 7 September working draft
- Re: [CORS] Multiple origin values?
- Re: [CORS] Multiple origin values?
- Re: [CORS] Multiple origin values?
- Re: [IndexedDB] A "versionchangeblocked" event
Sunday, 26 September 2010
- Re: CfC: First Public Working Draft of Web DOM Core; deadline October 2
- Re: CfC: First Public Working Draft of Web DOM Core; deadline October 2
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: CfC: First Public Working Draft of Web DOM Core; deadline October 2
- Re: Request for Comments: view-mode Media Feature test cases
- [CORS] Suggested HTTP error codes on forbidden origin, unsupported method, etc.?
- [Bug 10547] The rendering requirements for legend in fieldset need to change if the legend is floated or positioned
- [Bug 10546] It looks like at least some browsers restrict legend display values to "block"
Saturday, 25 September 2010
- Re: CfC: First Public Working Draft of Web DOM Core; deadline October 2
- CfC: First Public Working Draft of Web DOM Core; deadline October 2
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- [Bug 10420] Can you post sample of cross domain for web workers?
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
Friday, 24 September 2010
- Re: Small tweak to FileWriter's event sequences
- [Bug 10734] New: Create LR Grammar
- Re: [cors] Case-sensitive matching of origin URLs?
- Small tweak to FileWriter's event sequences
- Re: [IndexedDB] A "versionchangeblocked" event
- Re: Request for Comments: view-mode Media Feature test cases
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- [CORS] Access-Control-Expose-Headers
- [Bug 9989] Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.
- Re: [CORS] Multiple origin values?
- Re: [IndexedDB] A "versionchangeblocked" event
- [CORS] Multiple origin values?
- Re: [cors] Case-sensitive matching of origin URLs?
- Re: [IndexedDB] A "versionchangeblocked" event
- Re: [cors] Case-sensitive matching of origin URLs?
Thursday, 23 September 2010
- [cors] Case-sensitive matching of origin URLs?
- Re: [WebSQL/IndexedDB] Privacy issues in the wild
- Re: [IndexedDB] A "versionchangeblocked" event
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [IndexedDB] A "versionchangeblocked" event
- Re: Comments on proposed editor's draft of XBL2 from Forms WG
- CfC: LCWD of Widget Packaging and Configuration; deadline September 30
- Re: [IndexedDB] Accept simple strings in IDBDatabase.transaction()
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- [widgets] progress on i18n tests
- [widgets] Draft minutes from 23 September 2010 voice conf
- Re: Comments on proposed editor's draft of XBL2 from Forms WG
- Re: [IndexedDB] Simultaneous setVersion from multiple pages
- Re: [IndexedDB] A "versionchangeblocked" event
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [IndexedDB] Accept simple strings in IDBDatabase.transaction()
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: Comments on proposed editor's draft of XBL2 from Forms WG
- Re: Comments on proposed editor's draft of XBL2 from Forms WG
- Re: Comments on proposed editor's draft of XBL2 from Forms WG
Wednesday, 22 September 2010
- Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: Comments on proposed editor's draft of XBL2 from Forms WG
- Comments on proposed editor's draft of XBL2 from Forms WG
- [IndexedDB] A "versionchangeblocked" event
- Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- [IndexedDB] Accept simple strings in IDBDatabase.transaction()
- [IndexedDB] Simultaneous setVersion from multiple pages
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Comments on proposed editor's draft of XBL2 from Forms WG
- PROPFIND vs "simple methods", was: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- [Bug 10674] New: [IndexedDB] Changes to indexes (and their cursors)
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 23 September 2010 call
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: [widgets] Error in conformance test: dr
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
- Re: A URL API
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
Monday, 20 September 2010
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response
Monday, 20 September 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
Sunday, 19 September 2010
Saturday, 18 September 2010
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
Friday, 17 September 2010
- Re: A URL API
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- Re: A URL API
- A URL API
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: XBL2
- Re: XBL2
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
Thursday, 16 September 2010
- Re: FileSystem API - overwrite flag for copy/move?
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: FileSystem API - overwrite flag for copy/move?
- Re: FileSystem API - overwrite flag for copy/move?
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: Using FileWriter.truncate() to extend the length of a file?
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: FileSystem API - overwrite flag for copy/move?
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: ISSUE-133 (keyCode and charCode): Consider specifying keyCode and charCode [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-133 (keyCode and charCode): Consider specifying keyCode and charCode [DOM3 Events]
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- ISSUE-133 (keyCode and charCode): Consider specifying keyCode and charCode [DOM3 Events]
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- [Bug 10640] New: Allow for non-nullable objects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
Wednesday, 15 September 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- Re: ISSUE-126 (isTrusted): Consider changing 'trusted' to 'isTrusted' [DOM3 Events]
- DOM3 Events Comments
- ISSUE-132 (event.returnValue): Consider adding event.returnValue [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-131 (defaultView load ): Define load event to fire on defaultView [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-130 (Web IDL): Consider using Web IDL for the IDL fragments [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-129 (event constructors): Revist event constructors [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-128 (preventDefault): Define preventDefault to account for pre-propagation default actions [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-127 (cancelBubble / srcElement): Consider adding cancelBubble and srcElement [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-126 (isTrusted): Consider changing 'trusted' to 'isTrusted' [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-125 (DOM Views): Consider dropping DOM Views reference for HTML5 defaultView [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-124 (reword examples): Remove RFC2119 keywords from examples [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-123 (feature strings): Rationale for feature strings [DOM3 Events]
- [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor
- [widgets] Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- [widgets] Next call is September 23
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- WebIDL types and xsd types
Tuesday, 14 September 2010
- Re: File API exception codes
- Re: ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: [XHR2] FormData for <form>
- Re: [XHR2] FormData for <form>
- Re: [XHR2] FormData for <form>
- Re: [XHR2] FormData for <form>
- Re: [XHR2] FormData for <form>
- Re: [XHR2] FormData for <form>
- [XHR2] FormData for <form>
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR2] Comments on the 7 September working draft
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- Re: [XHR2] Comments on the 7 September working draft
- Web DOM Core Snapshot
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
Monday, 13 September 2010
- Re: [XHR2] Comments on the 7 September working draft
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR2] Comments on the 7 September working draft
- [Bug 10623] New: Simplify Web IDL exceptions
- [Bug 10622] New: ECMAScript binding for exceptions
Sunday, 12 September 2010
- [Bug 10610] Name DOMString just string?
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- [Bug 10610] New: Name DOMString just string?
- [Bug 10609] New: DOMTimeStamp should be defined in Web IDL
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
Saturday, 11 September 2010
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
Friday, 10 September 2010
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- Web Notification Working Group started
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- Re: XHR2 proposal: support for informational responses
- Re: XHR2 proposal: support for informational responses
- Re: XHR2 proposal: support for informational responses
- [Bug 10601] New: [IndexedDB] Need some way to create IDB events?
- XHR2 proposal: support for informational responses
- Re: [DOMCore] Attr
- [DOMCore] Attr
- Re: ISSUE-122 (add mousewheel): Consider adding 'mousewheel' again [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-122 (add mousewheel): Consider adding 'mousewheel' again [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-122 (add mousewheel): Consider adding 'mousewheel' again [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-121 (beforeInput): Consider generalizing the 'textInput' event to cover all user-initiated changes [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-120 (scroll basic event): Consider returning 'scroll' from UIEvent to Event interface [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-119 (input/keyboard locale): Consider adding input/keyboard locale to text and keyboard events [DOM3 Events]
- [Bug 10597] New: Array type missing from IDL grammar
Thursday, 9 September 2010
- Re: Flags for getFile/getDirectory (Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted)
- Re: FileSystem API - overwrite flag for copy/move?
- Re: XBL2
- Re: XBL2
- [Bug 10590] New: [IndexedDB] Default timeout duration needs to be specced
- [XHR2] Comments on the 7 September working draft
- Re: File API exception codes
- Re: FileSystem API - overwrite flag for copy/move?
- Re: FileSystem API - overwrite flag for copy/move?
- Re: FileSystem API - overwrite flag for copy/move?
- Re: [whatwg] ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: [whatwg] ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
- [Bug 10585] New: Need an error to indicate that the user disallowed access
- Re: [whatwg] ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: [whatwg] ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: [whatwg] ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: [whatwg] ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: [whatwg] ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: Flags for getFile/getDirectory (Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted)
- Re: File API exception codes
- Re: ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [WebSQL/IndexedDB] Privacy issues in the wild
- Re: [whatwg] ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration
- Re: [whatwg] ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
Tuesday, 7 September 2010
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
- Re: XBL2
- Re: [widgets] Seeking review of Widgets Dig Sig Test Suite
- Re: [WebSQL/IndexedDB] Privacy issues in the wild
- [widgets] Seeking review of Widgets Dig Sig Test Suite
- Re: [WebSQL/IndexedDB] Privacy issues in the wild
Tuesday, 7 September 2010
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
- Re: File API exception codes
- Re: ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- [Bug 10234] Unused argument in example function prepareDatabase()
- Re: Flags for getFile/getDirectory (Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted)
- Re: ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: Flags for getFile/getDirectory (Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted)
- Re: File API exception codes
- Re: Flags for getFile/getDirectory (Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted)
- Re: File API exception codes
- Re: File API exception codes
- Re: Flags for getFile/getDirectory (Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted)
- Re: FileSystem API - overwrite flag for copy/move?
- Re: Flags for getFile/getDirectory (Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted)
- Re: File API exception codes
- Re: ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
Tuesday, 7 September 2010
- [Bug 10143] how long is the comment going to be?
- [Bug 10131] Please make it clear that Last-Event-ID has a value that consists of UTF-8 octets. HTTP headers do not have strings.
- Re: ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Comment on Widget Interface...
- Re: Blob/File naming
- Re: Blob/File naming
- RE: Blob/File naming
- [WebSQL/IndexedDB] Privacy issues in the wild
- Re: Web DOM Core
- [widgets] RfC: LCWD of Widget Interface; deadline September 28
- Re: Possible addition to file API
- Re: Web DOM Core
- Re: Web DOM Core
- Re: Web DOM Core
- Re: Web DOM Core
- Re: Flags for getFile/getDirectory (Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted)
- Re: Web DOM Core
Monday, 6 September 2010
- Re: Web DOM Core
- Re: File API exception codes
- Re: [widgets] Buggy P&C i18n Tests
- Re: Web DOM Core
- Re: [widgets] Buggy P&C i18n Tests
- Re: [widgets] Buggy P&C i18n Tests
- Re: Web DOM Core
- File API exception codes
- Re: [widgets] Buggy P&C i18n Tests
- Web DOM Core
- Re: [widgets] Buggy P&C i18n Tests
- Please special-case "html" as the context of Range.createContextualFragment when the doc is an HTML doc
Sunday, 5 September 2010
- Re: [widgets] Buggy P&C i18n Tests
- Re: Initial feedback on XBL2
- Re: Initial feedback on XBL2
- Initial feedback on XBL2
- Re: CfC: publish a new WD of XHR Level 2; deadline September 3
Saturday, 4 September 2010
- Re: [widgets] Buggy P&C i18n Tests
- Re: XBL2
- [Bug 10547] New: The rendering requirements for legend in fieldset need to change if the legend is floated or positioned
- [Bug 10546] New: It looks like at least some browsers restrict legend display values to "block"
Friday, 3 September 2010
- Re: XBL2
- Re: XBL2
- Re: XBL2
- [widgets] error in test case: cx
- [widgets] Error in conformance test: dr
- [widgets] Buggy P&C i18n Tests
- Re: XBL2
- Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: XBL2
- Re: XBL2
- Re: XBL2
- Re: XBL2
- Re: XBL2
- Re: XBL2
- Re: XBL2
- Re: ACTION-574: Notify ArtB when the ED of the Widget Interface spec is ready to be published as a LCWD (Web Applications Working Group)
- Re: CfC: publish a new WD of XHR Level 2; deadline September 3
- Re: CfC: publish a new WD of XHR Level 2; deadline September 3
- XBL2
Thursday, 2 September 2010
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: CfC: publish a new WD of XHR Level 2; deadline September 3
- [widgets] Draft minutes from 2 September 2010 voice conf
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- RE: Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
Wednesday, 1 September 2010
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- [Bug 10527] New: [IndexedDB] Result of IDBCursor.remove and update unspecified.
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 2 September 2010 voice conf
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
Tuesday, 31 August 2010
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Blob/File naming
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- Seeking agenda items for WebApps' Nov 1-2 f2f meeting
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- [Bug 10130] The steps to "dispatch the event" within EventSource should first remove the LF from the data buffer before checking whether it is empty. Otherwise it can never be empty.
- FileSystem API - overwrite flag for copy/move?
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
Monday, 30 August 2010
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- [Bug 10130] The steps to "dispatch the event" within EventSource should first remove the LF from the data buffer before checking whether it is empty. Otherwise it can never be empty.
- [Bug 10128] Step 4 of the EventSource algorithm should reference the "fail the connection" algorithm.
- [Bug 10127] EventSource does not need to deal with HTTP 3xx responses as they are dealt with by the fetching algorithm.
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
Sunday, 29 August 2010
- Re: CfC: to publish a Last Call Working Draft of DOM 3 Events; deadline September 3
- Re: CfC: to publish a Last Call Working Draft of DOM 3 Events; deadline September 3
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
Saturday, 28 August 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- Re: CfC: to publish a Last Call Working Draft of DOM 3 Events; deadline September 3
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- Re: CfC: to publish a Last Call Working Draft of DOM 3 Events; deadline September 3
Friday, 27 August 2010
- Re: Using FileWriter.truncate() to extend the length of a file?
- [Bug 9823] Add "maxExecutionContexts" property with number of hardware execution contexts
- Re: CfC: publish a new WD of XHR Level 2; deadline September 3
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- CfC: to publish a Last Call Working Draft of DOM 3 Events; deadline September 3
- CfC: publish a new WD of XHR Level 2; deadline September 3
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- [cors] Cookies / Referer
- Re: [cors] Protecting benign but buggy client side code
- [Bug 10400] [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.continue should not return anything
- [Bug 10307] [indexedDB] The default version string is not specified
- [Bug 10349] [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.description should be removed from the spec and made optional
- [Bug 10165] [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort() should be removed
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- [Bug 10453] [IndexedDB] IDBIndex.openObjectCursor should return an IDBRequest
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
Thursday, 26 August 2010
- Using FileWriter.truncate() to extend the length of a file?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior
- Re: [XHR] Test Suite
- Re: CfC: resolutions for XHR Bugs 103{22,24,25,27,28}; deadline August 25
- [Bug 10324] send() should set Content-Type to text/html for HTML documents
- [Bug 10327] supported URL schemes in open()
- [Bug 10322] open() should not throw for non same-origin URL
- [Bug 10325] single conformance class
- [Bug 10328] change Accept-Charset to should not
- [Bug 10453] New: [IndexedDB] IDBIndex.openObjectCursor should return an IDBRequest
- Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior
- Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior
Wednesday, 25 August 2010
- Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior
- Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior
- [File API: FileSystem] Small change: createWriter
- Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior
- Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior
- Re: [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior
- [Bug 10431] New: [IndexedDB] Remove IDBDatabase.objectStore()
- [Bug 10430] New: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests can be reused and spec readyState's behavior
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- [widgets] Next call is September 2
- Re: [widgets] CfC to remove openURL from Widget object; deadline August 25
- [Bug 10426] New: [IndexedDB] All interfaces (except IDBEnvironment*) should not have NoInterfaceObject
Tuesday, 24 August 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- Re: [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- [IndexedDB] Constants and interfaces
- RE: [IndexedDB] Let's remove IDBDatabase.objectStore()
- Re: [IndexedDB] Let's remove IDBDatabase.objectStore()
- Re: [IndexedDB] Let's remove IDBDatabase.objectStore()
- Re: [widgets] widget tests for view mode media feature
Monday, 23 August 2010
- [IndexedDB] Let's remove IDBDatabase.objectStore()
- Re: Possible addition to file API
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: [IndexedDB] Full text indexing
- [IndexedDB] Full text indexing
Saturday, 21 August 2010
- Possible addition to file API
- Re: [Web Storage] A couple questions about the storage spec
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- [widgets] widget tests for view mode media feature
- Re: ACTION-570: Update packaging-configuration.rnc to reflect the iew-modes in the CR (Web Applications Working Group)
- [cors] Protecting benign but buggy client side code
Friday, 20 August 2010
Thursday, 19 August 2010
- [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.continue should return an IDBRequest
- Re: [Bug 10400] New: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.continue should return an IDBRequest
- Re: [Bug 10400] New: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.continue should return an IDBRequest
- Re: [Bug 10400] New: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.continue should return an IDBRequest
- Re: [Bug 10400] New: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.continue should return an IDBRequest
- Re: [Bug 10402] New: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.remove/update behavior when at end of range unspecified
- Re: [Bug 10402] New: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.remove/update behavior when at end of range unspecified
- Re: [Bug 10400] New: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.continue should return an IDBRequest
- [Bug 10402] New: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.remove/update behavior when at end of range unspecified
- Re: [Bug 10400] New: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.continue should return an IDBRequest
- [Bug 10400] New: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.continue should return an IDBRequest
- Re: Implementations
- Re: Implementations
- Implementations
- [Bug 10397] New: [IndexedDB] "upper" and "lower" bounds would be much clearer than right/left
- [Bug 10396] New: [IndexedDB] LEFT_BOUND and RIGHT_BOUND could be a bit more clear
- Re: [widgets] Widgets Updates
- Re: FileWriter behavior between writes
- Re: FileWriter behavior between writes
- FileWriter behavior between writes
Wednesday, 18 August 2010
Tuesday, 17 August 2010
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- Re: [Web Storage] A couple questions about the storage spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- [Bug 10379] This is working
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
- Re: XHR.responseBlob and BlobWriter [nee FileWriter]
Monday, 16 August 2010
- [Bug 10382] New: [IndexedDB] Note on avoiding reader/writer starvation
- [Bug 10381] New: [IndexedDB] Structured clones should be created synchronously
- Re: [Web Storage] A couple questions about the storage spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- [Bug 10379] New: This is working
- Re: [IndexedDB] Avoiding reader/writer starvation
- Re: [widgets] Widgets Updates
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- Re: [widgets] CfC to remove openURL from Widget object; deadline August 25
- Re: [IndexedDB] Explicitly stablishing the timing of clone creation
- Re: [IndexedDB] Avoiding reader/writer starvation
- Re: [widgets] Widgets Updates
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- Re: [widgets] CfC to remove openURL from Widget object; deadline August 25
- Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted
Sunday, 15 August 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Explicitly stablishing the timing of clone creation
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
Saturday, 14 August 2010
Friday, 13 August 2010
- [IndexedDB] Avoiding reader/writer starvation
- Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted
- Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted
- [IndexedDB] Explicitly stablishing the timing of clone creation
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- [widgets] CfC to remove openURL from Widget object; deadline August 25
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- [Bug 9745] We should require nextprotoneg support when doing the TLS handshake for WebSocket.
- Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted
- RE: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- RE: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
Thursday, 12 August 2010
- [Bug 10357] New: [IndexedDB] Remove the SNAPSHOT_READ transaction mode
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [IndexedDB] READ_ONLY vs SNAPSHOT_READ transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] READ_ONLY vs SNAPSHOT_READ transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] READ_ONLY vs SNAPSHOT_READ transactions
- [IndexedDB] READ_ONLY vs SNAPSHOT_READ transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- RE: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Is anyone attending "Web science: A new frontier" at the Royal Society?
- [widgets] Draft minutes 12 August 2010 voice conf
- [XHR] Redirects
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- [Bug 10349] New: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.description should be removed from the spec and made optional
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- RE: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- Re: [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- [IndexedDB] Languages for collation
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
Wednesday, 11 August 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- [XHR] Test Suite
Tuesday, 10 August 2010
Wednesday, 11 August 2010
Tuesday, 10 August 2010
Wednesday, 11 August 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- RE: CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17
- CfC: resolutions for XHR Bugs 103{22,24,25,27,28}; deadline August 25
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 12 August 2010 call
- [Bug 10211] Remove the no <host-specific> component requirement for targetOrigin, see implementor discussion in http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-July/027136.html and subsequent messages
Tuesday, 10 August 2010
- RE: ACTION-568: Create an alternative mechanism for openURL andsend it to the mail list (Web Applications Working Group)
- RE: ACTION-568: Create an alternative mechanism for openURL andsend it to the mail list (Web Applications Working Group)
- Re: [xhr] RFC2617 Digest authentication
- Re: CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17
- Re: [XHR] Status Update
- Re: CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17
- Re: [xhr] RFC2617 Digest authentication
- Re: CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17
- Re: CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- CfC: to publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline August 17
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: ACTION-568: Create an alternative mechanism for openURL andsend it to the mail list (Web Applications Working Group)
- Re: [XHR] Status Update
- [Bug 10323] responseXML for HTML documents
- RE: [XHR] Status Update
- Re: [XHR] Status Update
- RE: [XHR] Status Update
- Re: [XHR] Status Update
- RE: [XHR] Status Update
- RE: ACTION-568: Create an alternative mechanism for openURL andsend it to the mail list (Web Applications Working Group)
Monday, 9 August 2010
- Re: [XHR] Status Update
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- [Bug 10337] New: add [Supplemental] support
- [Bug 10336] New: "optional" should be allowed even if subsequent arguments aren't optional
- [Bug 10052] Specify setVersion details
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- RE: ACTION-568: Create an alternative mechanism for openURL and send it to the mail list (Web Applications Working Group)
- Re: [XHR] Status Update
- RE: [XHR] Status Update
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- RE: ACTION-568: Create an alternative mechanism for openURL and send it to the mail list (Web Applications Working Group)
- Re: [XHR] Status Update
- [IndexedDB] question about description argument of IDBFactory::open()
- Re: [XHR] Status Update
- RE: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- [XHR] Status Update
- [Bug 10328] New: change Accept-Charset to should not
- [Bug 10327] New: supported URL schemes in open()
- [Bug 10326] New: make "user:password" in URLs a SYNTAX_ERR
- [Bug 10325] New: single conformance class
- [Bug 10324] New: send() should set Content-Type to text/html for HTML documents
- [Bug 10323] New: responseXML for HTML documents
- [Bug 10322] New: open() should not throw for non same-origin URL
- [Bug 10321] [IndexedDB] Description attribute of IDBDatabase doesn't play nicely with run to completion
- [Bug 10321] New: [IndexedDB] Description attribute of IDBDatabase doesn't play nicely with run to completion
Friday, 6 August 2010
- Re: [Bug 10302] New: Introduce exception handlers at the transaction/database scope
- Re: ACTION-568: Create an alternative mechanism for openURL and send it to the mail list (Web Applications Working Group)
- [Bug 10307] New: [indexedDB] The default version string is not specified
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- [Bug 10305] New: [IndexedDB] Transactions need to be clarified
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [Bug 10302] New: Introduce exception handlers at the transaction/database scope
- [Bug 10304] New: Rename "remove" method on object store to "delete"
- [widgets] Test Suites
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- [Bug 10303] New: Transactions should not commit if code unwinds because of an exception
- [Bug 10302] New: Introduce exception handlers at the transaction/database scope
Thursday, 5 August 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- RE: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- [widgets] Draft minutes for 5 August 2010 voice conf
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
Wednesday, 4 August 2010
- Re: [WebIDL] interface objects and properties too restrictive?
- Please use public-script-coord mail list for Web IDL
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- RE: [WebIDL] interface objects and properties too restrictive?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- [IndexedDB] IndexedDB Sample Code & Documentation Tool
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- RE: [IndexedDB] Need a method to clear an object store
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- RE: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to clear an object store
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- Re: [WebIDL] interface objects and properties too restrictive?
- Re: [WebIDL] interface objects and properties too restrictive?
Tuesday, 3 August 2010
- [WebIDL] interface objects and properties too restrictive?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- [IndexedDB] Need a method to remove a database
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to clear an object store
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 5 August 2010 voice conf
- Re: [IndexedDB] Need a method to clear an object store
- Re: Term "user credentials" defined but not used in XHR CR
- [IndexedDB] Need a method to clear an object store
- Term "user credentials" defined but not used in XHR CR
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
- Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal
Monday, 2 August 2010
Friday, 30 July 2010
- Re: HTTP access control confusion
- Re: HTTP access control confusion
- Re: HTTP access control confusion
- Re: HTTP access control confusion
Thursday, 29 July 2010
Friday, 30 July 2010
Thursday, 29 July 2010
Wednesday, 28 July 2010
Tuesday, 27 July 2010
- Re: LCWD comments
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [xhr] RFC2617 Digest authentication
- [widgets] Next call is August 5
- Fwd: Web Notification Charter is out for review by W3C Members
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
Monday, 26 July 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: File URN lifetimes and SharedWorkers
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: File URN lifetimes and SharedWorkers
- Re: [CORS] What constitutes a "network error"?
- Re: [cors] Subdomains
- Re: [CORS] What constitutes a "network error"?
- Re: [CORS] What constitutes a "network error"?
Sunday, 25 July 2010
- Re: [cors] Subdomains
- Re: [CORS] What constitutes a "network error"?
- Re: [cors] Subdomains
- Re: [cors] Subdomains
- [Bug 10234] New: Unused argument in example function prepareDatabase()
- [cors] Subdomains
Saturday, 24 July 2010
Friday, 23 July 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: File URN lifetimes and SharedWorkers
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- RE: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- RE: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- RE: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
Thursday, 22 July 2010
- RE: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Drag event from DOM to external application
- Re: ISSUE-118 (dispatchEvent links): Consider allowing dispatchEvent for generic event duplication for links [DOM3 Events]
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: ISSUE-118 (dispatchEvent links): Consider allowing dispatchEvent for generic event duplication for links [DOM3 Events]
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- [Bug 9989] Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.
- Re: ISSUE-118 (dispatchEvent links): Consider allowing dispatchEvent for generic event duplication for links [DOM3 Events]
- [Bug 10213] The definition of "absolute url" makes https:foo not an absolute url, since its behavior depends on whether the base is https: or not. Is that desired? In particular, using this definition for websockets means that wss: urls with no forward slashes afte
- [Bug 10213] The definition of "absolute url" makes https:foo not an absolute url, since its behavior depends on whether the base is https: or not. Is that desired? In particular, using this definition for websockets means that wss: urls with no forward slashes afte
- [Bug 10129] The end of this WebSocket section links to EventSource with "fail the connection". It should link to the WebSocket "fail the connection" instead.
- [Bug 9989] Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.
- [Bug 9973] If the entry's name is "sec-websocket-protocol" 0 please don't put normative requirements in parenthesis
- [Bug 9766] We should expose the subprotocol for the case of the client not specifying one but the server specifying one
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: ISSUE-118 (dispatchEvent links): Consider allowing dispatchEvent for generic event duplication for links [DOM3 Events]
Wednesday, 21 July 2010
- Re: [CORS] What constitutes a "network error"?
- Re: [CORS] What constitutes a "network error"?
- ISSUE-118 (dispatchEvent links): Consider allowing dispatchEvent for generic event duplication for links [DOM3 Events]
- [IndexedDB] Full text indexing
- Re: New draft of FileSystem API posted
Tuesday, 20 July 2010
- [CORS] What constitutes a "network error"?
- [Bug 10213] The definition of "absolute url" makes https:foo not an absolute url, since its behavior depends on whether the base is https: or not. Is that desired? In particular, using this definition for websockets means that wss: urls with no forward slashes afte
- [Bug 10211] New: Remove the no <host-specific> component requirement for targetOrigin, see implementor discussion in http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-July/027136.html and subsequent messages
- HTML Media Capture draft from Device APIs and Policy Working Group
Saturday, 17 July 2010
Friday, 16 July 2010
Thursday, 15 July 2010
- RE: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- RE: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: onsuccess callback in race condition?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Re: onsuccess callback in race condition?
- Re: [IndexedDB] onsuccess callback in race condition?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Re: onsuccess callback in race condition?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Re: onsuccess callback in race condition?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Re: onsuccess callback in race condition?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- RE: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: onsuccess callback in race condition?
- [Bug 9975] Mozilla async API proposal
- Re: [IndexedDB] Re: onsuccess callback in race condition?
- [IndexedDB] Re: onsuccess callback in race condition?
- Re: onsuccess callback in race condition?
- onsuccess callback in race condition?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [cors] Unrestricted access
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- RfC: Mobile Web Application Best Practices: LCWD #2; deadline August 6
- [IndexedDB] The latest working draft is _really_ old
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- RE: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- RE: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- Re: [cors] Unrestricted access
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- RE: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- Re: [cors] Unrestricted access
- RE: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- RE: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
Wednesday, 14 July 2010
- Re: CfC: to publish new WD of CORS; deadline July 20
- Re: [cors] Unrestricted access
- Re: [cors] Unrestricted access
- Re: [cors] Unrestricted access
- [IndexedDB]: typo in section 3.1.4
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Callback order
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Callback order
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [Web Storage] A couple questions about the storage spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Callback order
- Re: CfC: to publish new WD of CORS; deadline July 20
- [Bug 10165] New: IDBRequest.abort() should throw on non-read-only requests or simply be removed
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- Re: CfC: to publish new WD of CORS; deadline July 20
- RE: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
Tuesday, 13 July 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.abort on writing requests
- Re: CfC: to publish new WD of CORS; deadline July 20
- Re: [cors] Unrestricted access
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: XHR HTTP method support, Re: XHR LC comments
- CfC: to publish new WD of CORS; deadline July 20
- RE: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: [cors] Unrestricted access
- [Bug 10143] New: how long is the comment going to be?
- [cors] Unrestricted access
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
Monday, 12 July 2010
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- RE: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- RE: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- RE: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: Lifetime of Blob URL
- Lifetime of Blob URL
Sunday, 11 July 2010
- Re: Goodbye
- [Bug 10131] New: Please make it clear that Last-Event-ID has a value that consists of UTF-8 octets. HTTP headers do not have strings.
- [Bug 10130] New: The steps to "dispatch the event" within EventSource should first remove the LF from the data buffer before checking whether it is empty. Otherwise it can never be empty.
Saturday, 10 July 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: Goodbye
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- [selectors-api] : bugs in latest level 1 and level 2 drafts
- [Bug 10129] New: The end of this WebSocket section links to EventSource with "fail the connection". It should link to the WebSocket "fail the connection" instead.
- [Bug 10128] New: Step 4 of the EventSource algorithm should reference the "fail the connection" algorithm.
- [Bug 10127] New: EventSource does not need to deal with HTTP 3xx responses as they are dealt with by the fetching algorithm.
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: How to get a FileWriter/BlobWriter/BlobSaver
Friday, 9 July 2010
- Re: How to get a FileWriter/BlobWriter/BlobSaver
- Re: How to get a FileWriter/BlobWriter/BlobSaver
- Re: BlobWriter simplification/split
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
Thursday, 8 July 2010
Friday, 9 July 2010
Thursday, 8 July 2010
- Re: BlobWriter simplification/split
- Re: How to get a FileWriter/BlobWriter/BlobSaver
- Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline July 13
- Goodbye
- Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline July 13
- Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline July 13
- Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline July 13
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- [widgets] Seeking feedback on Issue-116 openURL; deadline July 28
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- [widgets] Draft minutes from 8 July 2010 voice conf
- Fwd: changed FR and UK dial-in numbers for teleconferences
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- New draft of FileSystem API posted
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
Wednesday, 7 July 2010
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Callback order
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of API and Ontology for Media Resource 1.0; deadline 11 July 2010
- [Reminder]: Last Call Working Drafts transition announcement of the API and Ontology for Media Resource 1.0
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline July 13
- Re: [IndexedDB] Editors
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: question about number of occurrences of author and content elements (in Widget packaging spec)
- Re: question about number of occurrences of author and content elements (in Widget packaging spec)
- Re: Web Messaging status
- [widgets] viewmodes parsing tests
- [widgets] Draft agenda for 8 July 2010 voice conf
- Re: [cors] Allow-Credentials vs Allow-Origin: * on image elements?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Editors
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
Tuesday, 6 July 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Editors
- RE: [IndexedDB] Editors
- [IndexedDB] Editors
- [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft
- Re: WebIDL exceptions
- Web Notifications: public-web-notification created
- Re: HTML Device element status
- Re: CfC: Candidate Recommendation of XMLHttpRequest; deadline July 13
- Re: HTML Device element status
- HTML Device element status
- HTML Device element status
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
Monday, 5 July 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Existence checking
- [Bug 10088] New: The spec does not define what happens if an object store is modified while a cursor is iterating it.
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: [IndexedDB] Existence checking
- WebIDL exceptions
- [IndexedDB] Existence checking
Friday, 2 July 2010
Saturday, 3 July 2010
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: How to get a FileWriter/BlobWriter/BlobSaver
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: BlobWriter simplification/split
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
Friday, 2 July 2010
- RE: [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- [IndexedDB] Cursors and modifications
- RE: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: BlobWriter simplification/split
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- [Bug 10064] Modifying functions should throw when called under invalid conditions
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- RE: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: BlobWriter simplification/split
- Fwd: ISSUE-117: In Widget P&C Spec, need to clarify in the spec that dir attribute does not apply to attributes that are IRIs, Numeric, Keywords, etc. The dir attribute only affects human readable strings.
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: How to get a FileWriter/BlobWriter/BlobSaver
- Re: question about number of occurrences of author and content elements (in Widget packaging spec)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- [Bug 10064] New: Modifying functions should throw when called under invalid conditions
Thursday, 1 July 2010
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors
- Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors
Friday, 2 July 2010
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- RE: question about number of occurrences of author and content elements (in Widget packaging spec)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
Thursday, 1 July 2010
- Re: BlobWriter simplification/split
- Re: BlobWriter simplification/split
- How to get a FileWriter/BlobWriter/BlobSaver
- Re: LCWD comments
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors
- Re: LCWD comments
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- [widgets] Draft minutes from 1 July 2010 voice conf
- [Bug 10056] IDBEvent should inherit from DOM Level 3 Event
- [widgets] Draft references in Digital Signature for Widgets spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors
- [Bug 10058] New: Specify order for indexes which contain duplicate key values
- Re: any plans to move from cvs to git?
- Re: [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- LCWD comments
- Re: Custom DOM events and privileged browser add-ons; Was: Bubbling/Capturing for XHR + other non-DOM objects
- [IndexedDB] .value of no-duplicate cursors
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- [IndexedDB] Should .add/.put/.update throw when called in read-only transaction?
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor
- Re: [File API] Recent Updates To Specification + Co-Editor