Re: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.update for cursors returned from IDBIndex.openCursor from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2010-09-16 (public-webapps@w3.org from July to September 2010)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:04:35 -0700
To: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimb3ChowEPWBKuiM-SVZ+Fr1_FAHr8C1h0kni+o@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org> wrote:
> I think we should leave in openObjectCursor/getObject but remove
> openCursor/get for now.  We can then revisit any of these features as soon
> as there are implementations (both in the UAs and in web sites) mature
> enough for us to get real feedback on the features.

If you do so, could you migrate the names over?  No sense having a
useless "Object" hanging around in the name.  Terse is better.

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 16 September 2010 22:05:36 UTC