- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:54:48 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > The WG has published a Candidate Recommendation draft of XMLHttpRequest > recently: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/CR-XMLHttpRequest-20100803/ > > My apologies for not announcing this here when it happened. > > > As a result I worked most of last week and a bit during the weekend on a new > test suite for XMLHttpRequest. The old one had become quite obsolete. I hope > to put the results of that work online soon so people can take a look and > maybe contribute the missing pieces. I will email about that separately once > it is done. > > > As a result of working on the test suite I found a few minor issues that > would be nice to resolve (I'm not particularly interested in the solution to > each of these problems, but I thought I would propose one in order to move > things forward). I filed these bugs on them: > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10323 > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10324 > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10325 > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10326 > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10327 > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10328 > > I discussed with Art that I would not make changes to the editor's draft for > non-editorial changes until the WG agrees to a change. As such I propose we > have a Call for Consensus for each of the bugs above a couple of days from > now when people have had a change to take initial look. Bugs with comments > indicating that my solution may not be correct should be excluded from the > Call for Consensus until the concerns are addressed in some way. Some of these bugs are feature enhancements. Such as adding support for sending and receiving text/html documents. In the interest of getting us to rec as quickly as possible I suggest that these features are added to XHR L2 instead. / Jonas
Received on Monday, 9 August 2010 18:55:40 UTC