W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:39:01 -0400
Message-ID: <4CA21A25.6030408@mit.edu>
To: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>
CC: Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Jian Li <jianli@chromium.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>, Vladimir Vukicevic <vladimir@mozilla.com>, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
On 9/28/10 10:32 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
> I'd hate the idea of another flag in XHR. Why not just keep the raw bits and then convert when responseText is called? The only disadvantage of this is when the author makes multiple calls to responseText and I would not think that is a very common use case.

It's actually reasonably common; Gecko had some performance bugs filed 
on us until we started caching the responseText (before that we did 
exactly what you just suggested).

Oh, and some sites poll responseText from progress events for reasons I 
can't fathom.

Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 17:56:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:11 UTC