- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:43:38 -0700
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: art.barstow@nokia.com, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
I support it too. On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:00:06 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > >> >> I support this publication. > > So does Opera > > Chaals > >> On Jul 6, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> >>> Anne has now integrated the CR's exit criteria and text about security >>> considerations into the version proposed for CR: >>> >>> [[ >>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/#crec >>> >>> Candidate Recommendation Exit Criteria >>> >>> To exit the Candidate Recommendation (CR) stage the following criteria >>> must have been met: >>> >>> 1. There will be at least two interoperable implementations passing all >>> test cases in the test suite for this specification. An implementation is to >>> be available (i.e. for download), shipping (i.e. not private), and not >>> experimental (i.e. intended for a wide audience). The working group will >>> decide when the test suite is of sufficient quality to test >>> interoperability. >>> >>> 2. A minimum of six months of the CR stage will have elapsed. This is to >>> ensure that enough time is given for any remaining major errors to be >>> caught. The CR period will be extended if implementations are slow to >>> appear. >>> >>> 3. Text, which can be in a separate document, exists that explains the >>> security considerations for this specification. This may be done in a >>> generic manner as they are most likely applicable to various APIs. The >>> working group will decide whether the text is of sufficient quality. >>> >>> An update to this draft will point to the test suite. >>> ]] >>> >>> As such, the comment period for this Call for Consensus is extended to >>> July 13. >>> >>> As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged >>> and silence will be assumed to be assent. >>> >>> -Art Barstow >>> >>> On 6/15/10 1:03 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >>>> >>>> This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation of >>>> XMLHttpRequest: >>>> >>>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/ >>>> >>>> The comment period for the 19 November 2009 LCWD of XHR [LC] ended 16 >>>> December 2009 and the disposition of comments for this LCWD is: >>>> >>>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/disposition-of-comments-3 >>>> >>>> During this CfC review period, Anne and Thomas agreed to work on the >>>> Security Considerations issue and others are welcome to contribute. >>>> >>>> A test suite has not been agreed by the Working Group, and will not be >>>> required for the CR to be published. However, agreeing on a test suite >>>> will be part of the work we will do before this spec can move further >>>> than CR. >>>> >>>> The Editor's Draft does not yet include CR exit criteria. I would expect >>>> the criteria to be similar to our previous CRs i.e. require a thorough >>>> test suite and at least two implementations that pass all tests. (We can >>>> discuss the criteria separately.) >>>> >>>> This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's >>>> decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements for >>>> Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process >>>> Document: >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs >>>> >>>> As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged >>>> and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for comments is >>>> June 30. >>>> >>>> -Art Barstow >>>> >>>> [LC] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20091119/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group > je parle franįais -- hablo espaņol -- jeg lærer norsk > http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com > >
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 20:44:31 UTC