- From: Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:55:33 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Vladimir Vukicevic <vladimir@mozilla.com>
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 08.09.2010 17:35, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> >> ... >> Okay. I guess we can all add support for it and see who screams :-) >> >> I can certainly add this to XMLHttpRequest Level 2 and have been wanting >> to do that since forever. As you might have seen notes to that effect >> are in the specification. send() can be overloaded as per usual. >> Currently the proposal for the response member is responseBody which >> nicely maps to HTTP entity body. >> ... > > It does, but doesn't it clash with responseBody in Microsoft's ActiveX > control? > (<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms534368%28v=VS.85%29.aspx>) Mozilla's experimental name is "mozResponseArrayBuffer", so perhaps to avoid collisions the spec could call it responseArrayBuffer. -Ken
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 17:56:08 UTC