Re: [IndexedDB] Implicit transactions

  On 8/4/2010 10:53 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
>
> Whoa....transaction() is synchronous?!?  Ok, so I guess the entire premise
> of my question was super confused.  :-)
>
It is certainly spec'd that way [1].  The locks do not get acquired 
until the first actual bit of work is done though.

Cheers,

Shawn

[1] 
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#database-interface