[widgets] Best practice / recommendation for widget id scheme? from Arthur Barstow on 2010-09-28 (public-webapps@w3.org from July to September 2010)

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:10:25 -0400
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4CA1CD21.4010208@nokia.com>

  The widget element's id attribute says "An IRI attribute that denotes 
an identifier for the widget." and is silent on the value of the IRI's 
scheme.

What, if anything, do vendors recommend for the scheme?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of using the widget: URI 
scheme [ignoring the process-related issues that currently, the widget 
URI scheme spec is still a LCWD]?

-Art Barstow

Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 11:11:12 UTC