Sounds good, going back to the original topic, I'm convinced that the current specification (Flags object) is more JavaScript-ish and now I see no reason to change it. Thanks, Kinuko On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Darin Fisher wrote: > >> > >> Based on the ValidityState example, it seems that the members of Flags > >> should be camelCase then instead of UPPERCASE? > > > > The platform convention, insofar as there is a convention, is that > > constants are uppercase, members are camelCase, and interfaces and > > constructors are TitleCase. > > I was thinking of those as constants, but really they're members, so > yes, they should be camelCase. I'll fix them. > > > -- > > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > > >
Received on Thursday, 9 September 2010 23:19:22 UTC