W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: [Bug 10400] New: [IndexedDB] IDBCursor.continue should return an IDBRequest

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:53:05 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=cDe_fzW9Cn7MPe-RrSvSP9fy4a8R3WkAzjN3d@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org> wrote:
>> We also remove the return value from .continue() and make it "return
>> void". It doesn't make sense to return a bool indicating if this was
>> the last entry or not since we only know that information
>> asynchronously.
> Do you have thoughts on whether it should return an IDBRequest object
> though?  Obviously the request object it returns would be the same one
> originally returned from .openCursor().  As I mentioned in my reply, I could
> see it being confusing, but for completeness I wanted to hear your thoughts.

I don't think we should return a request, even the existing one. I
can't see an advantage, and it just risks making authors think that
they have to reregister event handlers etc.

/ Jonas
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2010 20:54:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:10 UTC