W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: [XHR] Redirects

From: Darin Fisher <darin@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:25:43 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimPXpn_pRP+tBmrCXA1dO372NTPuzBEn3Rk8Qx-@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>wrote:

>>> I think that obtaining the resolved Location for the redirect is the
>>> most tricky part, and we should come up with a solution where that is
>>> also available for people who do not want the default browser behavior.
>> I don't really like special casing the Location header here. It seems we
>> are ending up with two additional members for dealing with redirects. I
>> do not want another one. There are other headers where resolving a URL
>> might be needed. Adding a parameter to navigator.resolveURL() for a base
>> URL is the way to go I think.
> That sounds good to me. In general I think it would be great if there were
> standard APIs for URI/IRI construction, parsing and resolution...
Yes, that sounds pretty good to me too.

Received on Thursday, 16 September 2010 22:26:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:11 UTC