Re: [IndexedDB] Calling setVersion while already in a setVersion transaction

On 9/30/2010 2:16 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> Hm.  Actually, I think I like Jonas' proposal better than 1 or 2 (and Shawn,
> I see your point about why 2 is better than 1).  I also think that Shawn's
> example of doing multiple schema upgrades should still work 3 since we fire
> onsuccesses in the order that items were queued up.
I agree.  Three seems safer/better still!

Cheers,

Shawn