- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:36:28 +0200
- To: art.barstow@nokia.com, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:00:06 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > > I support this publication. So does Opera Chaals > On Jul 6, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> Anne has now integrated the CR's exit criteria and text about security >> considerations into the version proposed for CR: >> >> [[ >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/#crec >> >> Candidate Recommendation Exit Criteria >> >> To exit the Candidate Recommendation (CR) stage the following criteria >> must have been met: >> >> 1. There will be at least two interoperable implementations passing >> all test cases in the test suite for this specification. An >> implementation is to be available (i.e. for download), shipping (i.e. >> not private), and not experimental (i.e. intended for a wide audience). >> The working group will decide when the test suite is of sufficient >> quality to test interoperability. >> >> 2. A minimum of six months of the CR stage will have elapsed. This is >> to ensure that enough time is given for any remaining major errors to >> be caught. The CR period will be extended if implementations are slow >> to appear. >> >> 3. Text, which can be in a separate document, exists that explains >> the security considerations for this specification. This may be done in >> a generic manner as they are most likely applicable to various APIs. >> The working group will decide whether the text is of sufficient quality. >> >> An update to this draft will point to the test suite. >> ]] >> >> As such, the comment period for this Call for Consensus is extended to >> July 13. >> >> As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged >> and silence will be assumed to be assent. >> >> -Art Barstow >> >> On 6/15/10 1:03 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >>> This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation of >>> XMLHttpRequest: >>> >>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/ >>> >>> The comment period for the 19 November 2009 LCWD of XHR [LC] ended 16 >>> December 2009 and the disposition of comments for this LCWD is: >>> >>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/disposition-of-comments-3 >>> >>> During this CfC review period, Anne and Thomas agreed to work on the >>> Security Considerations issue and others are welcome to contribute. >>> >>> A test suite has not been agreed by the Working Group, and will not be >>> required for the CR to be published. However, agreeing on a test suite >>> will be part of the work we will do before this spec can move further >>> than CR. >>> >>> The Editor's Draft does not yet include CR exit criteria. I would >>> expect >>> the criteria to be similar to our previous CRs i.e. require a thorough >>> test suite and at least two implementations that pass all tests. (We >>> can >>> discuss the criteria separately.) >>> >>> This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's >>> decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements >>> for >>> Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process >>> Document: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs >>> >>> As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged >>> and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for comments is >>> June 30. >>> >>> -Art Barstow >>> >>> [LC] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20091119/ >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 20:37:08 UTC