- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:34:28 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10327
Summary: supported URL schemes in open()
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XHR 1.0
AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com
ReportedBy: annevk@opera.com
QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
I would like to have clearer language for URLs regarding their supported
<scheme> component.
I.e. I would like it to be clear from the draft what happens if you use any of
the following:
"mailto:foo@example.org"
"about:blank"
"tag:example.org"
"tel:+316..."
"data:text/html,..."
My preferred solution would be to throw unless the URL scheme is one of a
whitelist which contains:
http
https
ftp
file (implementation specific, must throw a SYNTAX_ERR if the current scheme
is not file)
We can add to this whitelist in the future, such as the blob URL scheme.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 9 August 2010 12:34:32 UTC