- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:38:20 -0700
- To: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
- Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> Given that the key-returning versions of these functions are just >> optimizations, at the very least, we should change the names though: >> get->getKey (or maybe getPrimaryKey?) >> openCursor->openKeyCursor (or maybe openPrimaryKeyCursor?) >> getObject->get >> openObjectCursor->openCursor > > I can't say that I feel strongly on the naming issue. Will ask around > here to see how people feel. This sounds like a workable solution. And also make IDBCursor.update and IDBCursor.delete throw an exception if called on a key-cursor. / Jonas
Received on Monday, 20 September 2010 21:39:15 UTC