- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:25:51 +0200
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Michael Nordman" <michaeln@google.com>, "Jian Li" <jianli@chromium.org>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Chris Marrin" <cmarrin@apple.com>, "Kenneth Russell" <kbr@google.com>, "Vladimir Vukicevic" <vladimir@mozilla.com>, "Chris Rogers" <crogers@google.com>
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:37:30 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >> I'm not sure. But you could just lazily construct the data based on what >> the author requests. If there are no use cases it is unlikely they will >> use both. > > You can't lazily construct the original byte stream from the > responseText, fwiw. I guess that fails for invalid characters, indeed. Though presumably they might be somewhere still if it is being cached? > So I'm not quite following how that paragraph would address Michael's > concerns. Yeah sorry. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 13:55:27 UTC