Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration

On 08.09.2010 17:35, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> ...
> Okay. I guess we can all add support for it and see who screams :-)
>
> I can certainly add this to XMLHttpRequest Level 2 and have been wanting
> to do that since forever. As you might have seen notes to that effect
> are in the specification. send() can be overloaded as per usual.
> Currently the proposal for the response member is responseBody which
> nicely maps to HTTP entity body.
> ...

It does, but doesn't it clash with responseBody in Microsoft's ActiveX 
control? 
(<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms534368%28v=VS.85%29.aspx>)

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 15:45:07 UTC