- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:13:20 +0200
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Jian Li" <jianli@chromium.org>
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:09:13 +0200, Jian Li <jianli@chromium.org> wrote: > Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other > spec, like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to > use the same name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer in > the Typed Arrays spec ( > https://cvs.khronos.org/svn/repos/registry/trunk/public/webgl/doc/spec/TypedArray-spec.html), > should we favor ArrayBuffer? > > In addition, can we consider adding ArrayBuffer support to BlobBuilder, > FormData, and XMLHttpRequest.send()? So TC39 is going to leave this thing alone? I.e. are we sure ArrayBuffer is the way of the future? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 07:13:54 UTC