- From: Jian Li <jianli@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:07:52 -0700
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTimmdhWe=pxUcRN5u78QDmUev8QGP9iVATaGgSA2@mail.gmail.com>
"new FormData(myformelement)" sounds good. On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > Note that you can always do: > > fd = new FormData; > > That is agreed by everyone to work. The question is how to instantiate > one which is prefilled with the data from a <form>. > > / Jonas > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com> > wrote: > > I have a preference for the second syntax. These sorts of classes > > should always be "new"-able. > > > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> > wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> There was some discussions regarding the syntax for generating a > >> FormData object based on the data in an existing <form>. I had > >> proposed the following syntax > >> > >> myformelement.getFormData(); > >> > >> however it was pointed out that the downside with this API is that > >> it's not clear that a new FormData object is created every time. > >> Instead the following syntax was proposed: > >> > >> new FormData(myformelement); > >> > >> however I don't see this syntax in the new XHR L2 drafts. Is this > >> merely an oversight or was the omission intentional? > >> > >> I'm fine with either syntax, but since we're getting close to shipping > >> Firefox 4, and I'd like to include this functionality (in fact, it's > >> been shipping for a long time in betas), I'd like to see if how much > >> consensus the various proposals carried. > >> > >> / Jonas > >> > >> > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 18:08:22 UTC