- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:52:10 +0200
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Tyler Close" <tyler.close@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org, Jaka Jančar <jaka@kubje.org>
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:39:49 +0200, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com> wrote: > Unless IE is soon to indicate support for all of the extra CORS > headers, pre-flight requests and configuration caching, the decision > should be to drop these unsupported features from the specification > and come up with a solution that can achieve consensus among widely > deployed browsers. I thought that was the declared policy for HTML5. This is not HTML5. Anyway, speculating what IE may or may not do is not really interesting. > Jaka's request is reasonable and what the WG is offering in response > is unreasonable. I expect many other web application developers will > have needs similar to Jaka's. Meeting those needs with a simple > solution is technically feasible. The politics seem to be much more > difficult. I'm not sure what this has to do with politics. I explained the rationale for the current design. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2010 14:52:52 UTC