- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:19:17 +0100
- To: Jian Li <jianli@chromium.org>
- CC: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Jian Li wrote: > Hi, > > Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other spec, > like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to use the same > name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer in the Typed Arrays > spec ( > https://cvs.khronos.org/svn/repos/registry/trunk/public/webgl/doc/spec/TypedArray-spec.html), > should we favor ArrayBuffer? > > In addition, can we consider adding ArrayBuffer support to BlobBuilder, > FormData, and XMLHttpRequest.send()? which reminds me, I meant to ask if the aforementioned TypedArray spec should be brought in to webapps / w3c land? seems to complement the other base types used in webidl etc rather well + my gut reaction was why isn't this standardized within w3c? Best, Nathan
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 23:20:10 UTC