Sunday, 31 October 2010
- Re: API question
 - Re: API question
 - Re: API question
 - Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - Re: Review of XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xhtml-rdfa-20100803/) (Knud)
 - Review of XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xhtml-rdfa-20100803/) (Knud)
 - Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - Re: API question
 - Re: API typos
 - Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - API question
 - Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - Re: API typos
 - API typos
 - Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - Re: RDFa API - graph?
 
Saturday, 30 October 2010
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - Fwd: Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - Re: RDFa API - graph?
 - RDFa API - graph?
 
Friday, 29 October 2010
- Re: Review of XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xhtml-rdfa-20100803/) (Tom)
 - Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - Review of XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xhtml-rdfa-20100803/) (Tom)
 - Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
 
Thursday, 28 October 2010
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - Re: ISSUE-57: TypedLiteralConverter Failures and Exceptions
 - Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
 - Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
 - Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
 - Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
 - Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-28
 - Re: Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
 - Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
 - Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
 - Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
 - RDFa API new Issues - summary
 - ISSUE-59: DataQuery [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - ISSUE-57: TypedLiteralConverter Failures and Exceptions
 - ISSUE-56: Relative URI resolution [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - ISSUE-55: Specifying that implementations must implement TypedLiteralConverters for all xsd numerical types [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - ISSUE-54: DataSerializer [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - ISSUE-53: DataParser Upgrades [RDFa 1.1 API]
 
Wednesday, 27 October 2010
- Re: Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
 - Re: Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
 - Fwd: Beware of W3C Accounting Phishing
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - ISSUE-52: Lightweight DataStore aligned with ECMAScript [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - ISSUE-51: Clean up create*** methods for RDF interfaces and move to DataContext [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - ISSUE-50: TypedLiteralConverter modifier parameter [RDFa 1.1 API]
 - ISSUE-49: RDFNode type, equality and canonicalization [RDFa 1.1 API]
 
Tuesday, 26 October 2010
- default prefix versus no prefix
 - Re: Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - new version of WebIDL
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Telecon Agenda - October 28th 2010, 1400 UTC
 
Monday, 25 October 2010
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 
Sunday, 24 October 2010
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: parse() and media types
 - Re: parse() and media types
 - Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
 - Re: XMLLiterals and Exclusive XML Canonicalization
 - Re: parse() and media types
 - Re: XMLLiterals and Exclusive XML Canonicalization
 - Re: XMLLiterals and Exclusive XML Canonicalization
 - Re: parse() and media types
 
Saturday, 23 October 2010
- Re: ISSUE-17 comment submitted to the PFWG
 - Re: RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21
 - parse() and media types
 - Re: RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21
 - Re: RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21
 - Re: RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21
 - Re: XMLLiterals and Exclusive XML Canonicalization
 
Friday, 22 October 2010
- XMLLiterals and Exclusive XML Canonicalization
 - Re: RDFa Talk at WebDirections South 2010
 - Re: RDFa Talk at WebDirections South 2010
 - ISSUE-17 comment submitted to the PFWG
 - RDFa Talk at WebDirections South 2010
 
Thursday, 21 October 2010
- Re: Updated RDFa Core Editor's Draft
 - RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21
 - Re: Profiles in RDFa 1.1
 - Re: RDFa Core Last Call telecon notes
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Tightening up the spec on what exactly an RDFa profile is
 - RDFa Core Last Call telecon notes
 - Re: Profiles in RDFa 1.1
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Tightening up the spec on what exactly an RDFa profile is
 - Re: Tightening up the spec on what exactly an RDFa profile is
 
Wednesday, 20 October 2010
- Re: ISSUE-48: @prefix missing from attribute list
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Profiles in RDFa 1.1
 - Tightening up the spec on what exactly an RDFa profile is
 - ISSUE-48: @prefix missing from attribute list
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 
Tuesday, 19 October 2010
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Updated RDFa Core Editor's Draft
 - Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-46: conversion of plain literals to IRIs
 - Updated RDFa Core Editor's Draft
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-47: case-sensitivity for terms
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
 - PROPOSAL #2 to close ISSUE-39: rdfa term mapping triples
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-46: conversion of plain literals to IRIs
 
Monday, 18 October 2010
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Telecon Agenda - October 21st 2010, 1400 UTC
 - ISSUE-47 (case-sensitivity for terms): How should case-sensitivity be handled for terms specified via RDFa Profile documents? [RDFa 1.1 Core]
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 
Tuesday, 12 October 2010
Wednesday, 13 October 2010
Thursday, 14 October 2010
- Re: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC
 - RE: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC
 
Wednesday, 13 October 2010
- Quick feedback on missing functionality requested (RDFa API)
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC
 - Re: Layers of RDF API
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 
Tuesday, 12 October 2010
- Layers of RDF API
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - RDFa API fundamentals
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - Collections / List
 - Re: RDFa API - Collections / List
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - Collections / List
 - Re: RDFa API - Collections / List
 - Re: RDFa API - Collections / List
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 
Monday, 11 October 2010
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC
 - RDFa API - Collections / List
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 
Sunday, 10 October 2010
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: prefix case-insensitivity
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 
Saturday, 9 October 2010
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - RDFa API - adding Namespace
 - Re: Term case-sensitivity
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: prefix case-insensitivity
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - prefix case-insensitivity
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: Term case-sensitivity
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
 - Re: Term case-sensitivity
 - Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
 - RDFa API object equality and canonicalization of RDF Nodes
 
Friday, 8 October 2010
- Term case-sensitivity
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
 - Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
 
Thursday, 7 October 2010
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-07
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
 - Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
 - Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - October 7th 2010, 1400 UTC
 
Wednesday, 6 October 2010
- Re: RDFa Core, section 4.2
 - Re: RDFa Core, section 4.2
 - RDFa Core, section 4.2
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 
Tuesday, 5 October 2010
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 
Monday, 4 October 2010
- RDFa API comments from TimBL
 - Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Telecon Agenda - October 7th 2010, 1400 UTC
 - Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Why RDFa profiles should be expressed in RDF
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-41: processor graph vocabulary
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
 
Sunday, 3 October 2010
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
 - ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-41: processor graph vocabulary
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples