Sunday, 31 October 2010
- Re: API question
- Re: API question
- Re: API question
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
- Re: Review of XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xhtml-rdfa-20100803/) (Knud)
- Review of XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xhtml-rdfa-20100803/) (Knud)
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
- Re: API question
- Re: API typos
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
- API question
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
- Re: API typos
- API typos
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
Saturday, 30 October 2010
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
- Fwd: Re: RDFa API - graph?
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
- Re: RDFa API - graph?
- RDFa API - graph?
Friday, 29 October 2010
- Re: Review of XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xhtml-rdfa-20100803/) (Tom)
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- Review of XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xhtml-rdfa-20100803/) (Tom)
- Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
Thursday, 28 October 2010
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- Re: ISSUE-57: TypedLiteralConverter Failures and Exceptions
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
- Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
- Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-28
- Re: Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
- Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- Re: [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
- Re: ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- [Fwd: ACTION-487 Assess potential impact of IRI draft on RDF/XML, OWL, and Turtle]
- RDFa API new Issues - summary
- ISSUE-59: DataQuery [RDFa 1.1 API]
- ISSUE-58: PlainLiteral and TypedLiteral value for strings [RDFa 1.1 API]
- ISSUE-57: TypedLiteralConverter Failures and Exceptions
- ISSUE-56: Relative URI resolution [RDFa 1.1 API]
- ISSUE-55: Specifying that implementations must implement TypedLiteralConverters for all xsd numerical types [RDFa 1.1 API]
- ISSUE-54: DataSerializer [RDFa 1.1 API]
- ISSUE-53: DataParser Upgrades [RDFa 1.1 API]
Wednesday, 27 October 2010
- Re: Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
- Re: Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
- Fwd: Beware of W3C Accounting Phishing
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- ISSUE-52: Lightweight DataStore aligned with ECMAScript [RDFa 1.1 API]
- ISSUE-51: Clean up create*** methods for RDF interfaces and move to DataContext [RDFa 1.1 API]
- ISSUE-50: TypedLiteralConverter modifier parameter [RDFa 1.1 API]
- ISSUE-49: RDFNode type, equality and canonicalization [RDFa 1.1 API]
Tuesday, 26 October 2010
- default prefix versus no prefix
- Re: Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- new version of WebIDL
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Volunteers needed to review XHTML+RDFa 1.1
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Telecon Agenda - October 28th 2010, 1400 UTC
Monday, 25 October 2010
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
Sunday, 24 October 2010
- Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: parse() and media types
- Re: parse() and media types
- Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify
- Re: XMLLiterals and Exclusive XML Canonicalization
- Re: parse() and media types
- Re: XMLLiterals and Exclusive XML Canonicalization
- Re: XMLLiterals and Exclusive XML Canonicalization
- Re: parse() and media types
Saturday, 23 October 2010
- Re: ISSUE-17 comment submitted to the PFWG
- Re: RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21
- parse() and media types
- Re: RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21
- Re: RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21
- Re: RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21
- Re: XMLLiterals and Exclusive XML Canonicalization
Friday, 22 October 2010
- XMLLiterals and Exclusive XML Canonicalization
- Re: RDFa Talk at WebDirections South 2010
- Re: RDFa Talk at WebDirections South 2010
- ISSUE-17 comment submitted to the PFWG
- RDFa Talk at WebDirections South 2010
Thursday, 21 October 2010
- Re: Updated RDFa Core Editor's Draft
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21
- Re: Profiles in RDFa 1.1
- Re: RDFa Core Last Call telecon notes
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Tightening up the spec on what exactly an RDFa profile is
- RDFa Core Last Call telecon notes
- Re: Profiles in RDFa 1.1
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Tightening up the spec on what exactly an RDFa profile is
- Re: Tightening up the spec on what exactly an RDFa profile is
Wednesday, 20 October 2010
- Re: ISSUE-48: @prefix missing from attribute list
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Profiles in RDFa 1.1
- Tightening up the spec on what exactly an RDFa profile is
- ISSUE-48: @prefix missing from attribute list
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
Tuesday, 19 October 2010
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Updated RDFa Core Editor's Draft
- Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-46: conversion of plain literals to IRIs
- Updated RDFa Core Editor's Draft
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-47: case-sensitivity for terms
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-16: RDF Collections
- PROPOSAL #2 to close ISSUE-39: rdfa term mapping triples
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-46: conversion of plain literals to IRIs
Monday, 18 October 2010
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Telecon Agenda - October 21st 2010, 1400 UTC
- ISSUE-47 (case-sensitivity for terms): How should case-sensitivity be handled for terms specified via RDFa Profile documents? [RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
Tuesday, 12 October 2010
Wednesday, 13 October 2010
Thursday, 14 October 2010
- Re: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC
- RE: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC
Wednesday, 13 October 2010
- Quick feedback on missing functionality requested (RDFa API)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC
- Re: Layers of RDF API
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
Tuesday, 12 October 2010
- Layers of RDF API
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- RDFa API fundamentals
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - Collections / List
- Re: RDFa API - Collections / List
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - Collections / List
- Re: RDFa API - Collections / List
- Re: RDFa API - Collections / List
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
Monday, 11 October 2010
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC
- RDFa API - Collections / List
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
Sunday, 10 October 2010
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Need volunteer reviewers for RDFa Core 1.1 (pre-Last Call)
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: prefix case-insensitivity
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
Saturday, 9 October 2010
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: RDFa API - adding Namespace
- RDFa API - adding Namespace
- Re: Term case-sensitivity
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: prefix case-insensitivity
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- prefix case-insensitivity
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: Term case-sensitivity
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
- Re: Term case-sensitivity
- Re: HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
- RDFa API object equality and canonicalization of RDF Nodes
Friday, 8 October 2010
- Term case-sensitivity
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
- HTML5 Polyglot spec and RDFa
Thursday, 7 October 2010
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-07
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
- Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: Telecon Agenda - October 7th 2010, 1400 UTC
Wednesday, 6 October 2010
- Re: RDFa Core, section 4.2
- Re: RDFa Core, section 4.2
- RDFa Core, section 4.2
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
Tuesday, 5 October 2010
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
Monday, 4 October 2010
- RDFa API comments from TimBL
- Re: Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Telecon Agenda - October 7th 2010, 1400 UTC
- Very early alpha state pure JavaScript implementation of the RDFa API draft spec released
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Why RDFa profiles should be expressed in RDF
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-41: processor graph vocabulary
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
Sunday, 3 October 2010
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples
- ISSUE-46 (conversion of plain literals to IRIs): Should plain literals that match fully qualified IRIs be automatically converted to IRIs [RDFa 1.1 Core]
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-45: cite and longdesc support
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-17: @role integration
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI?
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-41: processor graph vocabulary
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples