W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Some RDFa 1.1 Core edge cases that we need to clarify

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:23:05 +0200
Cc: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, nathan@webr3.org, public-rdfa-wg@w3.org, Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
Message-Id: <584B53EF-D558-493E-B965-A0C7F55E519E@w3.org>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>

On Oct 26, 2010, at 23:08 , Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:24:07 +0100
> Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com> wrote:
> 
>> I don't think we should go any further than the canonicalisation
>> algorithm.
> 
> FWIW, RDFa 1.0 says to use XML exclusive c14n. However, test case 0101
> in the RDFa 1.0 test suite calls for xml:lang attributes to be copied
> into the child elements of literal - that's a feature of xml c14n, but
> as I understand it, xml ec14n explicitly says not to do this.
> 
> Personally I'd be happiest to go with using plain old ec14n. It's a
> stable specification. XMLLiterals are a rare enough use case that
> anyone doing particularly delicate things with them should be expected
> to handle making the literal as self-contained as possible themselves
> rather than relying on the parser to do so.
> 

+1

Ivan


> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf






Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 07:22:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:22 UTC