- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:11:43 +0100
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:35:39 +0100 Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > PS: this is my understanding, that it is case insensitive - and Shane > indicated the same to me, just wanted to 100% clarify so I can cater > for it in the RDFa API and ensure this is stated in RDFa Core (if not > already). Do we have somewhere we note backcompat issues? This is different between RDFa 1.0 and 1.1. Not likely to catch many people out, but we should note it in an appendix or something. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Sunday, 10 October 2010 01:12:12 UTC