- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:39:43 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard.cyganiak@deri.org>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Sure. prefix="lala: h" is a perfectly legal prefix for a CURIE On 10/5/2010 11:41 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > I must admit I am not sure what you guys mean by this... > > Example? > > Ivan > > ---- > Ivan Herman > Tel:+31 641044153 > http://www.ivan-herman.net > > > > On Oct 5, 2010, at 18:09, Shane McCarron<shane@aptest.com> wrote: > >> >> On 10/5/2010 11:05 AM, Toby Inkster wrote: >>> .... >>> Also, I think ideally the range of rdfa:uri should be xsd:string, not >>> xsd:anyURI. This is because CURIE prefix expansions could theoretically >>> be too truncated to be legal URIs until the suffix is added. >> I agree with this. >> >> -- >> Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 >> Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 >> ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com >> >> -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:41:07 UTC