- From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 03:21:33 +0200
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Hi all,
> I was wondering if we might use:
> http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/
Sounds like a good thing to do, if the list can be extended to contain
http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/microformats
http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/microdata
along the already present
http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/RDFa
With regards to MIME types and file extensions for common RDF
serializations, those, as far as I can tell from the various specs or
spec-like documents, are meant to be as follows (where sometimes
common practice differs):
RDF/XML: application/rdf+xml (*.rdf)
Turtle: text/turtle (*.ttl)
N3: text/n3 (*.n3)
NTriples: text/plain (*.nt)
This list, as Nathan points out, leaves out embedded RDF/semantics
like RDFa, micro{data|formats}.
I think using an extended list based on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/
is a good solution. Plus a name change to the API ;-)
Best,
Tom
--
Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc.
http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac
Received on Sunday, 24 October 2010 01:22:25 UTC