W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > October 2010

Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-39: RDFa term mapping triples

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:47:22 +0100
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard.cyganiak@deri.org>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20101005204722.5f42c068@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:26:44 +0100
Richard Cyganiak <richard.cyganiak@deri.org> wrote:

> Can you point me to the place where you raised your concerns?

On the 2010-09-09 telecon, though it wasn't minuted much as I was
scribing and find it hard to scribe while talking.

Some of my concerns are outlined in
It mostly discusses prefix mapping, though many of the same concerns
apply to term mapping, albeit to a lesser degree.

Even if those concerns didn't apply to terms at all, I still think
there is value in keeping term mappings as-is for consistency
with prefix mappings.

Toby A Inkster
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2010 19:47:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:21 UTC