- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:47:22 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard.cyganiak@deri.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:26:44 +0100 Richard Cyganiak <richard.cyganiak@deri.org> wrote: > Can you point me to the place where you raised your concerns? On the 2010-09-09 telecon, though it wasn't minuted much as I was scribing and find it hard to scribe while talking. Some of my concerns are outlined in <http://www.w3.org/mid/bd11e07b6857681b4c1d25e21df964b0.squirrel@goddamn.co.uk>. It mostly discusses prefix mapping, though many of the same concerns apply to term mapping, albeit to a lesser degree. Even if those concerns didn't apply to terms at all, I still think there is value in keeping term mappings as-is for consistency with prefix mappings. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2010 19:47:51 UTC